123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645457)
1. In re Spring.
Berson MI
Medicoleg News; 1981 Jun; 9(3):2, 9. PubMed ID: 11645457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Matter of Spring.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Franklin
North East Rep Second Ser; 1980 May; 405():115-24. PubMed ID: 12041246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
Colabrese CA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan.
Bennett SA
Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Eichner/Storar decision: a year's perspective.
Dunn LJ
Law Med Health Care; 1982 Jun; 10(3):117-119, 141. PubMed ID: 11643893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In re Conroy.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Essex County
Atl Report; 1983 Feb; 457():1232-7. PubMed ID: 11648154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In the matter of Mary Hier.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 11644048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In the Matter of Elizabeth Visbeck: an alleged incompetent.
Nimz MM
Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):405-8. PubMed ID: 11644463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rasmussen v. Fleming.
Pollard CT
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(3):297-310. PubMed ID: 11644117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In re L.H.R.
Georgia. Supreme Court
South East Report Second Ser; 1984 Oct; 321():716-23. PubMed ID: 12041318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Therefore, choose death.
Brown ML
Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Live or let die; who decides an incompetent's fate? In re Storar and In re Eichner.
Bates KW
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 11655681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate.
Tecklenburg N
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In the Matter of Karen Quinlan. 10 Nov 1975.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division
Atl Report; 1975; 348():801-24. PubMed ID: 11645911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Court again considers life-prolonging case.
Am Med News; 1980 Feb; 23(5):11. PubMed ID: 11645418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides?
Corbett KA; Raciti RM
New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Annas GJ
New Physician; 1979 Mar; 28(3):45-46+. PubMed ID: 11664987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Constitutional law--right of privacy--qualified right to refuse medical treatment may be asserted for incompetent under doctrine of substituted judgment.
Davis PK
Emory Law J; 1978; 27(2):425-60. PubMed ID: 11665011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Withholding of life-supporting treatment from the mentally incompetent.
Paris JJ
Linacre Q; 1978 Aug; 45(3):237-48. PubMed ID: 11661604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
