These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645462)
1. Lepp v. Hopp; Hopp v. Lepp. ; ; Leg Med Q; 1980; 4():187-209. PubMed ID: 11645462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes. Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Hopp v. Lepp. Canada. Supreme Court Dom Law Rep; 1980 May; 112():67-83. PubMed ID: 12041085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent and the disclosure of risks of treatment: the Supreme Court of Canada decides. Dillon JR Bioethics Q; 1981; 3(3-4):156-62. PubMed ID: 11649479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Consent to medical treatment in Canada. Picard EI Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed consent and ophthalmology in Canada. Freeman GM; Rose CP Can J Ophthalmol; 1982 Feb; 17(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 7083055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical malpractice: informed consent to the locality rule. Karlson HC; Erwin RD Indiana Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 12(4):653-85. PubMed ID: 11665188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reibl v. Hughes. Leg Med Q; 1980; 4():209-25. PubMed ID: 11645463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Professional liability--what's new? Bull Am Coll Surg; 1974 May; 59(5):15-20. PubMed ID: 11664342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Malpractice: questions of consent in connection with treatment of genital or urinary organs. Frantz LB Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1979; 89():32-77. PubMed ID: 12091927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Malpractice risk assessment among different approaches for informed consent. Sato RL; Yamamoto LG; Li GG Hawaii Med J; 2000 Sep; 59(9):357-61. PubMed ID: 11055115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The doctrine of informed consent. Stewart T Insur Couns J; 1976 Jan; 43(1):118-34. PubMed ID: 11664632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent: recent developments that affect you. Barnes G Dimens Health Serv; 1981 Jul; 58(7):35-6. PubMed ID: 7286472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis. Monks SS Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Structuring the issues in informed consent. Somerville MA McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):740-808. PubMed ID: 11650591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Malpractice and informed consent--a legal ploy. DeLee ST Int Surg; 1976; 61(6-7):331-2. PubMed ID: 11664601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana. Boland GL LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. California Supreme Court expands the informed consent doctine; physicians have a duty to obtain an informed refusal: Truman v. Thomas. Cluff CA Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):933-47. PubMed ID: 11655722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]