These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645463)

  • 1. Reibl v. Hughes.
    Leg Med Q; 1980; 4():209-25. PubMed ID: 11645463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes.
    Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ
    Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reibl v. Hughes.
    Canada. Supreme Court
    Dom Law Rep; 1980 Oct; 114():1-35. PubMed ID: 12041068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consent to medical treatment in Canada.
    Picard EI
    Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient consent in Louisiana.
    Dewey EP
    Loyola Law Rev; 1981; 27(4):1166-83. PubMed ID: 11658777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structuring the issues in informed consent.
    Somerville MA
    McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):740-808. PubMed ID: 11650591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed dissent: a new corollary to the informed consent doctrine?
    Friedman DA
    Chic Kent Law Rev; 1981; 57(4):1119-44. PubMed ID: 11658347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana.
    Boland GL
    LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent.
    Halligan PD
    LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Liability and compensation aspects of immunization injury: a call for reform.
    McIntosh WK
    Osgoode Hall Law J; 1980 Dec; 18(4):584-613. PubMed ID: 11658622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed consent: recent developments that affect you.
    Barnes G
    Dimens Health Serv; 1981 Jul; 58(7):35-6. PubMed ID: 7286472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lepp v. Hopp; Hopp v. Lepp.
    ; ;
    Leg Med Q; 1980; 4():187-209. PubMed ID: 11645462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informed consent and the disclosure of risks of treatment: the Supreme Court of Canada decides.
    Dillon JR
    Bioethics Q; 1981; 3(3-4):156-62. PubMed ID: 11649479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Informed consent.
    Horan DJ; Halligan P
    Linacre Q; 1982 Nov; 49(4):358-69. PubMed ID: 11649603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emerging trends in the physician's duty to disclose: an update of Canterbury v. Spence.
    Knapp TA; Huff RL
    J Leg Med (N Y); 1975 Jan; 3(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11643353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent.
    Grubbs WG
    Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Controversial legal consent in clinical medicine.
    Chafe SM
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1992 Apr; 25(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 11651257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The conscious law.
    Goolsby AC
    State Health Legis Rep; 1983 Feb; 11(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11658379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Malpractice: questions of consent in connection with treatment of genital or urinary organs.
    Frantz LB
    Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1979; 89():32-77. PubMed ID: 12091927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The doctrine of informed consent.
    Stewart T
    Insur Couns J; 1976 Jan; 43(1):118-34. PubMed ID: 11664632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.