249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645478)
21. The Title X family planning subsidies: the government's role in moral issues.
Reitler EG
Harvard J Legis; 1990; 27(2):453-95. PubMed ID: 11656070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Unemancipated minors' rights of access to contraceptives without parental consent or notice--the squeal rule and beyond.
Best M
Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 1983; 8(2):219-50. PubMed ID: 11658756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Does the state action doctrine compel nominally private hospitals to make abortion services available despite "conscience clauses".
Shuger NB
Md Law Forum; 1974; 4(3):113-24. PubMed ID: 11663479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Doe v. Beal: abortion, Medicaid, and equal protection.
Wilcox JK
Va Law Rev; 1976 May; 62(4):811-37. PubMed ID: 11663695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The Americans with Disabilities Act and refusals to provide medical care to persons with HIV/AIDS.
DeSario JP; Slack JD
John Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 27(2):347-62. PubMed ID: 11654697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Forgoing treatment of critically ill newborns and the legal legacy of Baby Doe.
Nelson LJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1992; 6(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Bowen v. American Hospital Association: federal regulation is powerless to save Baby Doe.
Cantrell DF
Indiana Law Rev; 1986; 19(4):1199-218. PubMed ID: 11650766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Deception research and the HHS final regulations.
Dresser RS
IRB; 1981 Apr; 3(4):3-4. PubMed ID: 11661944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. AIDS in the long-term care setting.
Felix DE; Mueller DG; Schmid CN
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1988; 7(1):115-53. PubMed ID: 11650035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Recent governmental action regarding the treatment of seriously ill newborns.
Lawton SE; Carder EB; Weisman AW
J Coll Univ Law; 1985; 11(4):405-16. PubMed ID: 11651864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Ordinary care.
America (NY); 1983 Apr; 148(17):330. PubMed ID: 11658412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The issues as viewed by the legislature.
Horowitz LC
Clin Res; 1973 Oct; 21(4):782-4. PubMed ID: 11660971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. U.S. seeks to require treatment of all hospital emergency cases.
Tolchin M
N Y Times Web; 1988 Jun; ():1, 8. PubMed ID: 11646699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond.
Phillips CA
Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. How general an assurance?
Pattullo EL; Levine RJ
IRB; 1981 May; 3(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 11649369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The right to abortion under Medicaid.
Butler PA
Clgh Rev; 1974 Apr; 7(12):713-20. PubMed ID: 11663473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The selective funding problem: abortions and religious schools.
McConnell MW
Harv Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 104(5):989-1050. PubMed ID: 11656068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails.
Curran M
Ob Gyn News; 1983 Dec 15-31; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Protecting the rights of nursing home patients: using federal law.
Kapp MB
FLA Bar J; 1981 Mar; 55(3):212-5. PubMed ID: 11650715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Toward a First Amendment theory of doctor-patient discourse and the right to receive unbiased medical advice.
Berg P
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1994 Mar; 74(2):201-66. PubMed ID: 11659979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
