These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645490)
1. Two teams attempt implantation of 'donor embryos'; Australians achieve an 'adoptive' pregnancy. Med World News; 1983 May; 24(9):9-10. PubMed ID: 11645490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Norfolk clinic to launch donor egg program. Med World News; 1984 Feb; 25(3):71. PubMed ID: 11645506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Law for protection of embryos. Germany Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Dec; No. 64():9-11. PubMed ID: 11660824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Australia studying ethics of using donor oocytes. Ob Gyn News; 1983 Jul 1-14; 18(13):3, 30. PubMed ID: 11658368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ob's. face ethical questions raised by in-vitro, in-vivo fertilization. Ob Gyn News; 1983 Aug 15-31; 18(16):1, 28-29. PubMed ID: 11658382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. New innovations in conception and their effects upon our law and morality. Shapiro ED NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1986; 31(1):37-59. PubMed ID: 11658943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In-vitro fertilization, embryo transfer, and embryo freezing. Halperin M Assia Jew Med Ethics; 1988 May; 1(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12083148 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Who are the parents of biotechnological children? Palmer LI Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: legal issues. Field M Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1589-98. PubMed ID: 11653381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: fertile areas for litigation. Lorio KV Southwest Law J; 1982 Feb; 35(5):973-1011. PubMed ID: 11658618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of legal parentage in egg donation, embryo transplantation, and gestational surrogacy arrangements. Goodwin A Fam Law Q; 1992; 26(3):275-91. PubMed ID: 11659602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The stork market: the law of the new reproduction technologies. Andrews LB ABA J; 1984 Aug; 70(8):50-6. PubMed ID: 11658526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Artificial conception: the challenge for family law. Wadlington W Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):465-514. PubMed ID: 11651807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Human embryo transplants. Brotman H N Y Times Mag; 1984 Jan; ():42-47, 50-51. PubMed ID: 11647766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A time to be born, a time to die: alternative reproduction and Texas probate law. Heard LD St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):927-63. PubMed ID: 11652490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The surrogate mother--a growing problem. Sappideen C Univ N S W Law J; 1983; 6(1):79-102. PubMed ID: 11649732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Austrian law on procreative medicine. Morgan D; Bernat E Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Nov; No. 83():13-6. PubMed ID: 11651517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice. Schenker JG; Frenkel DA Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro fertilization: perspectives on current issues. Ephross JN Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(3):447-72. PubMed ID: 11656221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]