98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645499)
21. The ethics committee at work.
Rubinow MB
Conn Med; 1984 Nov; 48(11):759. PubMed ID: 11644172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. I.V. withdrawal: the severance of medicine's or society's umbilical cord? Barber v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 137 Cal.App.3d 1006, 195 Cal.Rptr. 484 (1983).
Chrisman JP
Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):941-72. PubMed ID: 11652480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention.
Riga PJ
Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The recent amendments to the Texas Natural Death Act: implications for health care providers.
Greenfield RE
St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):1003-51. PubMed ID: 11652489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan.
Bennett SA
Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Surrogate decision making for mentally incapacitated adults.
Nelson LJ; Golenski JD
Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Feb-Mar-Apr; 1(2 3 & 4):1-28. PubMed ID: 11650108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Bedside story.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(1):85-6. PubMed ID: 11643075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Toward a clear definition of ethics committees.
Brodeur D
Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):233-47. PubMed ID: 11649570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. It's our right to pull the plug.
Bates RC
Med Econ; 1977 May; 54(10):162-6. PubMed ID: 11661474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The Quinlan decision.
Lyons C
Christ Crisis; 1976 May; 36(8):103-4. PubMed ID: 11661438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Case presentation 1 (1990): an infant with necrotic skin lesion -- responses by the Bioethics Study Group that convenes at the National Institutes of Health and by the patient's HEC.
HEC Forum; 1990; 2(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 11645675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Stopping treatment on grounds of futility: a role for institutional policy.
Stell LK
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):481-97. PubMed ID: 11652704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
Smith SR
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Persistent vegetative state: medical, ethical, religious, economic and legal perspectives.
Oldershaw JB; Atkinson J; Boshes LD
DePaul J Health Care Law; 1997; 1(3):495-536. PubMed ID: 15282884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A good death: medical ethics grand rounds.
Ram MD; Thompson JS; Kilner JF
Hosp Pract; 1986 Apr; 21(4):31-32, 37-38+. PubMed ID: 11652500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The withdrawal of treatment: the costs and benefits of guidelines.
Shannon TA
Bioethics Dig; 1978 Apr; 3(4):1-6. PubMed ID: 11660917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Mediating life and death decisions.
Hoffmann DE
Ariz Law Rev; 1994; 36(4):821-77. PubMed ID: 11656438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A PVS patient on dialysis.
West MB; Brown K; Dula A; Costanza D
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 11651297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The tragic case of Karen Ann Quinlan.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1979 Jun; 43(6):399. PubMed ID: 11643501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The tort liability of hospital ethics committees.
Merritt AL
South Calif Law Rev; 1987 Jul; 60(5):1239-97. PubMed ID: 11658947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
