258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645527)
1. Lack of federal funds, oversight for IVF and embryo transfer focus of congressional hearing.
Med World News; 1984 Sep; 25(17):67, 71. PubMed ID: 11645527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. U.S. rules hurt fertilization research.
Krieger L
Am Med News; 1984 Oct; 27(37):14. PubMed ID: 11658529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Techniques of Assisted Reproduction: Act 35/1988.
Spain
Bol Of Estado Gac Madr Spain; 1988 Nov; No. 282():. PubMed ID: 12041504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. What should we do with surplus potential humans?
Annas GJ
Washington Post; 1985 Mar; ():K1, K5. PubMed ID: 11647789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. IVF--in vitro fertilization.
Kieffer GH
Am Biol Teach; 1980 Apr; 42(4):211-218, 231. PubMed ID: 11658496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Federal embryo research is backed: ethicists see benefits overriding qualms.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1999 May; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies: a critique of the final report.
Shanner L
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1994 Mar; 27(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 11659921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies.
American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee
Fertil Steril; 1986 Sep; 46(3) Suppl. 1):1S-94S. PubMed ID: 11658710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A survey of the legal, ethical, and public policy considerations of in vitro fertilization.
McCartan MK
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):695-731. PubMed ID: 11650889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Hatch on hatcheries.
Hatch O
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1979 Dec; 125(184):S19525-33. PubMed ID: 11663207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies.
American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee
Fertil Steril; 1990 Jun; 53(6) Suppl. 2):i-1S-109S. PubMed ID: 11659223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Test tube babies: the quandaries of creation.
Futurist; 1979 Dec; 13(6):487-8. PubMed ID: 11662006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Embryo research tests NIH's mettle.
Gavaghan H
Nat Med; 1995 Jan; 1(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 11644731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Law No. 35/1988 of 22 Nov 1988 on Assisted Reproduction Procedures (BoletÃn Oficial del Estado, 24 Nov 1988, No. 282, pp. 33373-33378).
Spain
Int Dig Health Legis; 1989; 40(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 11659178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Misapplied ethical considerations: U.S. federal stem cell mandates lack global focus and market foresight.
Fowler HL
Cornell Int Law J; 2004; 36(3):521-44. PubMed ID: 16602208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. 'Govt. block of fetal research set back in-vitro work 5 years.
Kubetin WR
Ob Gyn News; 1984 Mar 15-31; 19(6):1, 38. PubMed ID: 11647773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro fertilization: eliminating the current state of limbo between pre-embryonic rights and the fundamental right to procreate.
Langley DB
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1991; 26(4):1217-43. PubMed ID: 11659618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Embryo research.
Lynch R;
Origins; 1994 Dec; 24(27):462. PubMed ID: 11659915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Law, policy and personhood in the context of the techniques of human experimentation in modern medicine.
Hicks SC
Cap Univ Law Rev; 1990; 19(2):255-99. PubMed ID: 11659475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Experiments on embryos -- permissions and prohibitions under the Infertility (Medical Procedures) Act 1984 (Vic.
Kasimba P
Aust Law J; 1986 Dec; 60(2):675-9. PubMed ID: 11659075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
