These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645550)

  • 1. AAP survey: 'Baby Doe' committees active, growing.
    Med World News; 1984 Dec; 25(24):29. PubMed ID: 11645550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The legacy of Baby Doe: five perspectives.
    Ciulla JB
    Psychol Today; 1987 Jan; 21(1):70-71, 74-75. PubMed ID: 11658812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health care groups favor local 'Baby Doe' review.
    Med World News; 1983 Sep; 24(18):9. PubMed ID: 11645497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hospital bioethics: a beginning knowledge base for the neonatal social worker.
    Silverman E
    Soc Work; 1992 Mar; 37(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 11642999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Another court challenge predicted following revised 'Baby Doe' rule.
    Med World News; 1983 Jul; 24(14):54, 59. PubMed ID: 11645668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suit emphasizes drawbacks of 'Baby Doe' rules.
    Am Med News; 1984 Mar 23-30; 27(12):4. PubMed ID: 11646355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lawsuit challenges 'Baby Doe' regulation.
    Am Med News; 1984 Mar 23-30; 27(12):1, 7. PubMed ID: 11646353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Infant Bioethics Committees: dispute over guidelines.
    Murray TH
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Jun; 14(3):3-4. PubMed ID: 11644149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
    Barry RL
    Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Twenty questions about ethics committees.
    Capron AM
    Ethics Comm Newsl; 1984 Jun; 1(4):2-10. PubMed ID: 11651761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
    Shapiro RS; Barthel R
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Painful decisions: the role of the medical ethicist.
    Bouton K
    N Y Times Mag; 1990 Aug; ():22-25, 53, 62+. PubMed ID: 11647882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethical implications of clinical judgment (the role of the hospital bioethics committee).
    Sherman SR
    Conn Med; 1984 Feb; 48(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 11644115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails.
    Curran M
    Ob Gyn News; 1983 Dec 15-31; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethics committee guidelines issued.
    Krieger L
    Am Med News; 1984 May; 27(18):1, 34. PubMed ID: 11646386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Legal perspectives on institutional ethics committees.
    Capron AM
    J Coll Univ Law; 1985; 11(4):417-31. PubMed ID: 11651865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomedical ethics.
    Walters L
    JAMA; 1985 Oct; 254(16):2345-8. PubMed ID: 11643821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ethics consultants: a self-portrait of decision makers.
    Bermel J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Dec; 15(6):2. PubMed ID: 11643846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deciding whether the baby lives.
    Curran M
    Washington Post; 1985 May; ():Health Su-17. PubMed ID: 11646285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hospital ethics committees: questions and answers.
    Levine C
    Dimens Health Serv; 1986 Oct; 63(7):26-9. PubMed ID: 11643939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.