These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. What should we do with surplus potential humans? Annas GJ Washington Post; 1985 Mar; ():K1, K5. PubMed ID: 11647789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Monash University sells in vitro technology. Bioeth News; 1985 Jul; 4(4):2-4. PubMed ID: 11649641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice. Schenker JG; Frenkel DA Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Australia's IVF program sinks roots in U.S. Med World News; 1986 Feb; 27(4):107. PubMed ID: 11645722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Whose baby is it anyway? Vines G New Sci; 1986 Jul; 111(1515):26-7. PubMed ID: 11658781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Lack of federal funds, oversight for IVF and embryo transfer focus of congressional hearing. Med World News; 1984 Sep; 25(17):67, 71. PubMed ID: 11645527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Australians plan tight hold on embryo experiments. Ford J New Sci; 1984 Sep; 103(1421):4. PubMed ID: 11658547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial conception: legislative approaches. Krause HD Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legislative guidelines to govern in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Williams HE Santa Clara Law Rev; 1986; 26(2):495-518. PubMed ID: 11651873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro fertilization: eliminating the current state of limbo between pre-embryonic rights and the fundamental right to procreate. Langley DB Wake Forest Law Rev; 1991; 26(4):1217-43. PubMed ID: 11659618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro fertilization and embryos: the need for international guidelines. Fiandaca S Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1998; 8(2):337-404. PubMed ID: 12465644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The marketing of the new reproductive technologies: medicine, the media, and the idea of progress. Raymond JG Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 11650967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Last-chance babies: the wonders of in vitro fertilization. Kramer M New York; 1985 Aug; 18(31):34-42. PubMed ID: 11658563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A piece of yourself in the world. Lieber J Atl Mon; 1989 Jun; 263(6):76-80. PubMed ID: 11650212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. U.S. rules hurt fertilization research. Krieger L Am Med News; 1984 Oct; 27(37):14. PubMed ID: 11658529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. 'Govt. block of fetal research set back in-vitro work 5 years. Kubetin WR Ob Gyn News; 1984 Mar 15-31; 19(6):1, 38. PubMed ID: 11647773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A survey of the legal, ethical, and public policy considerations of in vitro fertilization. McCartan MK Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):695-731. PubMed ID: 11650889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]