These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645585)
41. The court's misguided judicial activism. Catholic Bishops of New York Origins; 1996 Apr; 25(43):752. PubMed ID: 11654377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. HIV and dentistry. Lawyer MH Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1994; 29(1):297-359. PubMed ID: 11660043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights? Sourial WH Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade. Lockhart T Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Notifying husbands about an abortion: an empirical look at constitutional and policy dilemmas. Plutzer E; Ryan B Sociol Soc Res; 1987 Apr; 71(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 11659056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. An overview of state involuntary civil commitment statutes. Van Duizend R; McGraw BD; Keilitz I Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(3):328-35. PubMed ID: 11658581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: a path to constitutional equalibrium. Chopko ME Campbell Law Rev; 1990; 12(2):181-220. PubMed ID: 11656527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The right to die: an exercise of informed consent, not an extension of the constitutional right to privacy. Lyon EA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1990; 58(4):1367-95. PubMed ID: 11659504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health: a clear and convincing call for comprehensive legislation to protect incompetent patients' rights. Suhr JN Am Univ Law Rev; 1991; 40(4):1477-519. PubMed ID: 11651350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Scientific uncertainty in regulating deliberate release of genetically engineered organisms: substantive judicial review and institutional alternatives. Deatherage SD HELR Harvard Environ Law Rev; 1987; 11(1):203-46. PubMed ID: 11650817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Equitable access to biomedical advances: getting beyond the rights impasse. Mariner WK Conn Law Rev; 1989; 21(3):571-603. PubMed ID: 11650430 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. In vitro fertilization: eliminating the current state of limbo between pre-embryonic rights and the fundamental right to procreate. Langley DB Wake Forest Law Rev; 1991; 26(4):1217-43. PubMed ID: 11659618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. What right to die? Rosen J New Repub; 1996 Jun; 214(26):28-31. PubMed ID: 11656670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Fair play for hospital personnel. Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1973 May; 47(9):111-6. PubMed ID: 4702079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]