These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645640)

  • 1. Statutory prohibition on use of appropriated funds in programs where abortion is a method of family planning; standard of compliance for family planning services projects; proposed rules.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
    Fed Regist; 1987 Sep; 52(169):33210-5. PubMed ID: 11645640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. U.S. suspends plan to cut off funds for abortion ties.
    Pear R
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Mar; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11646665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statutory prohibition on use of appropriated funds in programs where abortion is a method of family planning; standard of compliance for family planning services projects--PHS. Final rules.
    Fed Regist; 1988 Feb; 53(21):2922-46. PubMed ID: 10285637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Title X family planning gag rule: can the government buy up constitutional rights?
    Chervin CI
    Stanford Law Rev; 1989 Jan; 41(2):401-34. PubMed ID: 11655926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Souter questions a curb on doctors: Justices skeptical of federal bar to advice on abortion.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Oct; ():A1, A22. PubMed ID: 11647430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Title X family planning subsidies: the government's role in moral issues.
    Reitler EG
    Harvard J Legis; 1990; 27(2):453-95. PubMed ID: 11656070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New York v. Sullivan.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Fed Report; 1989 Nov; 889():401-18. PubMed ID: 11648392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Groups challenging abortion rules.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Feb; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11646640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rust v. Sullivan.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1991 May; 111():1759-89. PubMed ID: 12041295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Bowen.
    U.S. District Court, D. Massachusetts
    Fed Suppl; 1988 Mar; 679():137-48. PubMed ID: 11648376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Latest administration tactic makes abortion fight a free speech issue.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Feb; ():E7. PubMed ID: 11647385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. U.S. abortion rule is upheld by judge.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Jul; ():46. PubMed ID: 11647389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Family-planning clinics face dilemma over their mission.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Jun; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rust v. Sullivan: triumph of the right over reason.
    Call EC
    J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Winter; 31(1):123-42. PubMed ID: 11656449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. U.S. issues limits on abortion aid by family clinics.
    Pear R
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Aug; ():1, 26. PubMed ID: 11647377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reagan bars mention of abortion at clinics receiving U.S. money.
    Pear R
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Jan; ():1, 50. PubMed ID: 11647381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Massachusetts v. Secretary of Health and Human Services.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
    Fed Report; 1990 Mar; 899():53-79. PubMed ID: 11648391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. West Virginia Association of Community Health Centers v. Sullivan.
    U.S. District Court, S.D. West Virginia, at Charleston
    Fed Suppl; 1990 Mar; 737():929-57. PubMed ID: 11648394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Five justices uphold U.S. rule curbing abortion advice Some clinics to still advise but forgo aid.
    Greenhouse L; Brozan N
    N Y Times Web; 1991 May; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 11647436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New York v. Bowen.
    U.S. District Court, S.D. New York
    Fed Suppl; 1988 Jun; 690():1261-74. PubMed ID: 11648393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.