234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645643)
1. Access to employee exposure and medical records; final rule.
U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Fed Regist; 1988 Sep; 53(189):38140-68. PubMed ID: 11645643
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Access to employee exposure and medical records; construction industry; lifting of administrative stay.
U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Fed Regist; 1981 Sep; 46(178):45758-61. PubMed ID: 11655471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic testing in the workplace.
Rowinski L
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():375-413. PubMed ID: 11645613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Confidentiality of occupational medical records.
American Medical Association. Board of Trustees
Conn Med; 1981 Jul; 45(7):459-60. PubMed ID: 11643653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Biological monitoring and genetic screening in the industrial workplace: a synopsis and analysis.
Field RI
Law Med Health Care; 1983 Jun; 11(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 11644183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Access to medical records, part 1: who may review a patient's medical record.
Roach WH
Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Jun; 1(4):35-52. PubMed ID: 11645451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information; proposed rule.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Secretary
Fed Regist; 1999 Nov; 64(212):59917-60016. PubMed ID: 11645354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Privacy of medical records.
Association of the Bar of the City of New York. Committee on Federal Legislation
Rec Assoc Bar City New York; 1980 Nov; 35(8):488-514. PubMed ID: 11649553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biological monitoring: the employer's dilemma.
Miller FH
Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):388-426. PubMed ID: 11644166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Disclosure of patient health care records in Wisconsin.
Lehner P
Wis Bar Bull; 1984 Aug; 57(8):16-18, 70-71. PubMed ID: 11658813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Absolutely not confidential.
Norton C
Hippocrates (Sausalito); 1989; 3(2):52-9. PubMed ID: 11650178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records.
U.S. Public Health Service
Fed Regist; 1980 Jan; 45(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 11645427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Access to employee exposure and medical records.
U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Fed Regist; 1978 Jul; 43(141):31371-4. PubMed ID: 11663866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Privacy Act of 1974; system of records.
U.S. Public Health Service
Fed Regist; 1985 Jul; 50(138):29270-4. PubMed ID: 11655765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. OSHA regulation of industrial applications of recombinant DNA technology.
Korwek EL
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1981; 50(2):284-313. PubMed ID: 11649489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Access to employee exposure and medical records. A statement of the American Medical Association to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
Sammons JH
JAMA; 1978 Nov; 240(20):2175-6. PubMed ID: 702729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. OSHRC rules sterilization is not an occupational hazard.
Jameson R
Trial; 1981 Jul; 17(7):6-7. PubMed ID: 11653563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The evolution of the right to privacy after Roe v. Wade.
Barnard D
Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2 3):365-525. PubMed ID: 11659051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Health information privacy.
Gostin LO
Cornell Law Rev; 1995 Mar; 80(3):451-528. PubMed ID: 11660159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. When patients' records are commodities for sale.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1995 Nov; ():A1, C14. PubMed ID: 11648013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
