These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645653)
1. Two test cases clarify courts' plug-pulling power. Med World News; 1978 Mar; 19(6):15-6. PubMed ID: 11645653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. "Pulling the plug": are you ready to make the decision? Ginsburg WH Physicians Manage; 1985 Mar; 25(3):349-51, 354, 357-60 passim. PubMed ID: 10270469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Treating defective newborns: the ethical dilemma. Brant J; McNulty A Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):34-36,45-47. PubMed ID: 11651708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Last rights: an analysis of refusal and withholding of treatment cases. Brant J Miss Law Rev; 1981; 46(2):337-70. PubMed ID: 11651657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Relitigating life and death. Dresser R Ohio State Law J; 1990; 51(2):425-37. PubMed ID: 11652817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The life support cases: myths and realities. Hartz JN Los Angel Lawyer; 1982; 5(5):18-20, 33, 52+. PubMed ID: 11653530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Refusing life-sustaining treatment for incompetent patients: mere existence or a quality life? Cerminara KL Med Trial Tech Q; 1988; 35(2):121-45. PubMed ID: 11652537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria? Longino PH Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Constitutional law--John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth: removing courts from the decision to terminate life support systems. Christie SA; Howard ML; MacKenzie LA Notre Dame Law Rev; 1984; 60(1):122-37. PubMed ID: 11652476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. 'Right-to-die' theory upheld in New Jersey. Rust M Am Med News; 1985 Feb; 28(5):1, 23. PubMed ID: 11653617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Termination of medical treatment. Horan DJ Forum; 1981; 16(3):470-87. PubMed ID: 11662910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Constitutional law--right to refuse medical treatment--decisions to terminate life-prolonging treatment for incompetent patients--In re Spring, No. 2030 (Mass. order of Jan. 14, 1980). Lubinsky MS West New Engl Law Rev; 1980; 2(4):759-74. PubMed ID: 11649558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Natural death: an alternative in New Jersey. Levant S Georgetown Law J; 1985 Jun; 73(5):1331-54. PubMed ID: 11651811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die. Glick HR West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Live or let die; who decides an incompetent's fate? In re Storar and In re Eichner. Bates KW Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 11655681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In re Conroy: forging a path to death with dignity. Agrawal A Boston Univ Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 67(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 11649960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Family law--guardians of incompetent persons can refuse life-prolonging treatment for their wards. Gilman GS Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1978; 12(4):1039-57. PubMed ID: 11662777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides? Corbett KA; Raciti RM New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. "Right to die" cases: a model for judicial decision-making? Webster WL N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1990; 7(2):140-56. PubMed ID: 11652592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent. Brant J Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]