These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645754)

  • 1. A ray of light about frozen embryos.
    Clayton EW
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1992 Dec; 2(4):347-59. PubMed ID: 11645754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The implications of Davis v. Davis for reproductive rights analysis.
    Prygoski PJ
    Tenn Law Rev; 1994; 61(2):609-46. PubMed ID: 11652933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frozen embryos: a need for thawing in the legislative process.
    Davidoff BE
    SMU Law Rev; 1993; 47(1):131-64. PubMed ID: 11652686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Davis v. Davis: the applicability of privacy and property rights to the disposition of frozen preembryos in intrafamilial disputes.
    Muller RJ
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1993; 24(3):763-804. PubMed ID: 11659794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Court gives ex-husband rights on use of embryos.
    Smothers R
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Solomon decision: a study of Davis v. Davis.
    Eget MM
    Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1113-28. PubMed ID: 11651437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Allocation of decision-making rights to frozen embryos.
    Poole EK
    Am J Fam Law; 1990; 4(1):67-102. PubMed ID: 11659329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro fertilization: eliminating the current state of limbo between pre-embryonic rights and the fundamental right to procreate.
    Langley DB
    Wake Forest Law Rev; 1991; 26(4):1217-43. PubMed ID: 11659618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kass v. Kass.
    New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department
    Wests N Y Suppl; 1997 Sep; 663():581-602. PubMed ID: 12041117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Davis v. Davis: what about future disputes?
    Feliciano T
    Conn Law Rev; 1993; 26(1):305-53. PubMed ID: 11660034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Judge rules woman who provides eggs has right to decide embryos' fate.
    N Y Times Web; 1995 Jan; ():B5. PubMed ID: 11647991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tennessee judge awards custody of 7 frozen embryos to woman.
    Smothers R
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Sep; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11647867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. American abortion law applied to new reproductive technology.
    Hemphill L
    Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(3):361-86. PubMed ID: 11656220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prior agreements for disposition of frozen embryos.
    Robertson JA
    Ohio State Law J; 1990; 51(2):407-24. PubMed ID: 11652816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New turn in a couple's fight over embryos.
    N Y Times Web; 1990 May; ():21. PubMed ID: 11646769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In the beginning: the legal status of early embryos.
    Robertson JA
    Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):437-517. PubMed ID: 11659369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Unwanted, anonymous, biological descendants": mandatory donation laws and laws prohibiting preembryo discard violate the constitutional right to privacy.
    Brown JP
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1993; 28(1):183-237. PubMed ID: 11659778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frozen embryos: what are they and how should the law treat them?
    Sublett MF
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1990; 38(4):585-616. PubMed ID: 11659459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Israeli court gives wife right to embryos.
    Greenberg J
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Sep; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Embryos in a divorce case: joint property or offspring?
    Smothers R
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Apr; ():1, 8. PubMed ID: 11646711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.