These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645758)

  • 1. High court may cut abortion choices.
    Med World News; 1982 Sep; 23(20):10. PubMed ID: 11645758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ACOG, others file high court abortion brief.
    Wood AP
    Ob Gyn News; 1982 Oct 15-31; 17(20):1, 54. PubMed ID: 11655558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Constitutional law--right to privacy--municipal roadblock to abortion denounced--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., 103 S.Ct. 2481(1983).
    Crusius CJ
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 1984; 14(3):658-82. PubMed ID: 11658811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The viability of the trimester approach.
    Calder KA
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1984; 13(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 11658808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The trimester approach: how long can the legal fiction last?
    Casurella JG; Schrock CT
    Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 35(4):891-913. PubMed ID: 11658750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
    Pirner RK; Williams LB
    Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Akron decision: a pragmatic politician's parody of Solomon.
    Noonan JT
    Hum Life Rev; 1983; 9(3):5-18. PubMed ID: 11655719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The future of abortion.
    McDaniel A
    Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Missouri loses latest round in battle over permissible abortion regulations.
    Baldwin ML
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 50(3):320-39. PubMed ID: 11658633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A deceptive liberty: the Supreme Court, minors, and abortion.
    Donnelly TP
    Georgetown Univ Right to Life J; 1983; 3():15-22. PubMed ID: 11655594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion regulation: the circumscription of state intervention by the doctrine of informed consent.
    Abbot L
    Georgia Law Rev; 1981; 15(3):681-713. PubMed ID: 11658321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Constitution and the anomaly of the pregnant teenager.
    Buchanan E
    Ariz Law Rev; 1982; 24(3):553-610. PubMed ID: 11658425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
    Kudner KE
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Constitutional law--a minor's abortion right under a parental notice statute.
    Czarnecki MS
    Wayne Law Rev; 1982; 28(4):1901-28. PubMed ID: 11658440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abortions for minors after Bellotti II: an analysis of state law and a proposal.
    Lozano GD
    St Marys Law J; 1980; 11(4):946-97. PubMed ID: 11658462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion choice and the law in Vermont: a recent study.
    Olmstead FH
    Vt Law Rev; 1982; 7(2):281-313. PubMed ID: 11655820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minors' rights to confidential contraceptive services: the limits of state power.
    Paul EW; Klassel D
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11658948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers.
    Wardle LD
    Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
    Sourial WH
    Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis.
    Linton PB
    Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.