These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645759)

  • 1. Prisoners lose suit to make FDA block drug executions.
    Med World News; 1982 Sep; 23(20):14-5. PubMed ID: 11645759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. American doctors do not have to attend executions.
    Rhein R
    BMJ; 1993 Mar; 306(6881):813. PubMed ID: 11643119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anatomy of a regulation: the continuing case of research on prisoners.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1981 Oct; 11(5):2-3. PubMed ID: 11643672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical and psychological experimentation on California prisoners.
    Herch F; Flower R
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():351-84. PubMed ID: 11661107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A doctor's dilemma: resolving the conflict between physician participation in executions and the AMA's Code of Medical Ethics.
    Ragon SA
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1995; 20(3):975-1007. PubMed ID: 11654742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chaney v. Heckler.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
    Fed Report; 1983 Oct; 718():1174-200. PubMed ID: 11648203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The state's Dr. Death: what's unethical about physicians helping at executions?
    Davis M
    Soc Theory Pract; 1995; 21(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11654565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perspectives on the FDA status of drug products manufactured by the recombinant DNA technique.
    Korwek EL; Trinker DS
    Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1981 Oct; 36(10):517-35. PubMed ID: 11650658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heckler v. Chaney.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1985 Mar; 105():1649-68. PubMed ID: 12041278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The uncertain application of the right of privacy in personal medical decisions: the Laetrile cases.
    Christensen J
    Ohio State Law J; 1981; 42(2):523-50. PubMed ID: 11649547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Focus on doctors and executions.
    Altman LK
    N Y Times Web; 1994 Mar; ():31. PubMed ID: 11647017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. RU 486 and the politics of drug regulation in the United States and France.
    Kramnick RK
    Cornell Int Law J; 1992; 25():667-718. PubMed ID: 11656340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The right of privacy in choosing medical treatment: should terminally ill persons have access to drugs not yet approved by the Food and Drug Administration?
    Power SH
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):693-714. PubMed ID: 11650094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Position statement of the AFCR on FDA proposal to assign scientific review of new drugs for human use to local institutional review boards.
    American Federation for Clinical Research
    Clin Res; 1982 Feb; 30(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 11653562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Private rights to adulterated/misbranded articles.
    McMonagle L
    AIDS Public Policy J; 1987; 2(2):33-49. PubMed ID: 11650029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surrogate consent and the incompetent experimental subject.
    Bein PM
    Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1991 Sep; 46(5):739-71. PubMed ID: 11651381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forced administration of sex-drive reducing medications to sex offenders: treatment or punishment?
    Miller RD
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998; 4(1-2):175-99. PubMed ID: 12484316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FDA treatment use regulations: a compassionate response.
    Weitzman SA; Marcy T
    AIDS Public Policy J; 1987; 2(2):22-32. PubMed ID: 11650028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
    Kobasic DM
    J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regulating biotechnology.
    McGarity TO
    Issues Sci Technol; 1985; 1(3):40-56. PubMed ID: 11649701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.