These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
10. GMAG and the teenage jackass. Denselow J New Sci; 1982 Aug; 95(1320):558-61. PubMed ID: 11655478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ministers maintain secrecy over genetic releases. Milne R; Watts S New Sci; 1990 May; 126(1715):22. PubMed ID: 11655983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic manipulation: watchdog to bark less often. Nature; 1983 Apr; 302(5908):467. PubMed ID: 11643975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The end of Britain's genetic engineering watchdog? New Sci; 1980 Dec; 88(1231):694. PubMed ID: 11664096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A legal perspective on the control of the technology of genetic engineering. Cripps YM Mod Law Rev; 1981 Jul; 44(4):369-87. PubMed ID: 11650549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. 'No incentives' for academics to respect gene laws. Watts S New Sci; 1990 Apr; 126(1714):33. PubMed ID: 11655970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Gene-splice approvals on two fronts. Miller JA Sci News; 1985 Nov; 128(21):324. PubMed ID: 11653676 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Proposals for the future regulation of biotechnology in Australia. Neilson R Melb Univ Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 18(3):692-8. PubMed ID: 11654325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Biotech firms win approval for more open-air tests. Joyce C New Sci; 1984 Jun; 102(1413):4. PubMed ID: 11655646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Firm gets NIH panel's approval for judge-barred DNA field test. Hilts PJ Washington Post; 1984 Jun; ():A1, A10. PubMed ID: 11646391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulation of genetic engineering: less concern about Frankensteins but time for action on commercial production. Karny GM Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):815-68. PubMed ID: 11649588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]