These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645770)

  • 1. Genetic engineering: approval for first British virus release experiment.
    Newmark P
    Nature; 1986 Mar; 320(6057):2. PubMed ID: 11645770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scottish forest to host gene experiment.
    New Sci; 1986 Mar; 109(1501):16. PubMed ID: 11655756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regulating genetic manipulation.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1990 May; No. 58():13-4. PubMed ID: 11651983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. UK revamps genetic engineering panel to focus on policy.
    Nature; 1996 Sep; 383(6596):114. PubMed ID: 11644801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controlling the release of genetically engineered organisms.
    Dixon B
    BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6692):145. PubMed ID: 11644414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A shepherd for transgenic animals.
    Connor S
    New Sci; 1989 Jan; 121(1648):25. PubMed ID: 11655927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic engineering watchdog wins backing.
    New Sci; 1982 Sep; 95(1325):894. PubMed ID: 11655498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic manipulation: British watchdog reconstituted.
    Beardsley T
    Nature; 1984 Feb; 307(5950):406. PubMed ID: 11653513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic engineering: watchdog lives to bite again.
    New Sci; 1981 Jan; 89(1234):7. PubMed ID: 11664098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. GMAG and the teenage jackass.
    Denselow J
    New Sci; 1982 Aug; 95(1320):558-61. PubMed ID: 11655478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ministers maintain secrecy over genetic releases.
    Milne R; Watts S
    New Sci; 1990 May; 126(1715):22. PubMed ID: 11655983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic manipulation: watchdog to bark less often.
    Nature; 1983 Apr; 302(5908):467. PubMed ID: 11643975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The end of Britain's genetic engineering watchdog?
    New Sci; 1980 Dec; 88(1231):694. PubMed ID: 11664096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A legal perspective on the control of the technology of genetic engineering.
    Cripps YM
    Mod Law Rev; 1981 Jul; 44(4):369-87. PubMed ID: 11650549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 'No incentives' for academics to respect gene laws.
    Watts S
    New Sci; 1990 Apr; 126(1714):33. PubMed ID: 11655970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gene-splice approvals on two fronts.
    Miller JA
    Sci News; 1985 Nov; 128(21):324. PubMed ID: 11653676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proposals for the future regulation of biotechnology in Australia.
    Neilson R
    Melb Univ Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 18(3):692-8. PubMed ID: 11654325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biotech firms win approval for more open-air tests.
    Joyce C
    New Sci; 1984 Jun; 102(1413):4. PubMed ID: 11655646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Firm gets NIH panel's approval for judge-barred DNA field test.
    Hilts PJ
    Washington Post; 1984 Jun; ():A1, A10. PubMed ID: 11646391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regulation of genetic engineering: less concern about Frankensteins but time for action on commercial production.
    Karny GM
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):815-68. PubMed ID: 11649588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.