BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645775)

  • 1. Fraud will out--or will it?
    Tangney JP
    New Sci; 1987 Aug; 115(1572):62-3. PubMed ID: 11645775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
    Fox MF
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
    Sise CB
    San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research universities and scientific misconduct -- history, policies, and the future.
    Steneck NH
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):310-30. PubMed ID: 11653367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A social control perspective on scientific misconduct.
    Hackett EJ
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):242-60. PubMed ID: 11653363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical school guidelines for investigating misconduct and fraud in science.
    Annau Z
    Account Res; 1992; 2(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 11653980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Teaching scientific integrity.
    Gifford F
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 11656760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
    Pennock RT
    Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific misconduct: individual deviance or system complacency?
    Luft P; Sprague RL
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 11653391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Process and detection in fraud and deceit.
    Silverman S
    Ethics Behav; 1994; 4(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 11652795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 1: the spectrum of deviant behavior in science.
    Garfield E
    Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(14):3-7. PubMed ID: 11649955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.
    Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS
    IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In the trenches, doubts about scientific integrity.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1992 Mar; 255(5052):1636. PubMed ID: 11642983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deception in scientific research.
    Woolf PK
    Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 2: why does fraud happen and what are its effects?
    Garfield E
    Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(15):3-10. PubMed ID: 11649943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The scientific community perspective on research integrity.
    Teich AH
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):117-22. PubMed ID: 11652291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
    Hilgartner S
    IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Her study shattered the myth that fraud in science is a rarity.
    Altman LK
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():C3. PubMed ID: 11647002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.