These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645812)

  • 1. Fertility technologies and trans-kin altruism.
    Murphy GL
    J Med Humanit; 1996; 17(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 11645812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Socio-demographic and fertility-related characteristics and motivations of oocyte donors in eleven European countries.
    Pennings G; de Mouzon J; Shenfield F; Ferraretti AP; Mardesic T; Ruiz A; Goossens V
    Hum Reprod; 2014 May; 29(5):1076-89. PubMed ID: 24626802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The new science of genetic self-interest.
    DeVore I; Morris S
    Psychol Today; 1977 Feb; 10(9):42-46+. PubMed ID: 11661442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Religion's role in human evolution: the missing link between ape-man's selfish genes and civilized altruism.
    Burhoe RW
    Zygon; 1979 Jun; 14(2):135-62. PubMed ID: 11649388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The biological child.
    MacKellar C
    Ethics Med; 1996; 12(3):65-9. PubMed ID: 11660746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Of eggs, embryos and altruism.
    Raymond JG
    Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 11650399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority's consultation document on research and fertility treatment using human ova and ovarian tissue obtained from live women, cadavers or fetuses.
    Centre For Bioethics and Public Policy (London)
    Ethics Med; 1995; 11(2):33-6. PubMed ID: 11660189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sociobiology: scientists at odds. How much of our behavior is determined by our genes?
    MacPherson M
    Washington Post; 1976 Nov; ():B1+. PubMed ID: 11648812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The rights of the many?
    New Sci; 1994 Jan; 141(1908):3. PubMed ID: 11659727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The stork market: the law of the new reproduction technologies.
    Andrews LB
    ABA J; 1984 Aug; 70(8):50-6. PubMed ID: 11658526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Culture and sociobiology.
    Barkow JH
    Am Anthropol; 1978 Mar; 80(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 11649393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion and parental responsibility.
    Winston ME
    J Med Humanit Bioeth; 1986; 7(1):33-56. PubMed ID: 11650732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Report on Australian national conference: "Surrogacy -- In Whose Interest?", Melbourne, February 1991.
    Salomone J
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 11651336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproductive technologies and the theology of the family.
    Rae SB; Core JH
    Ethics Med; 1994; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 11652747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wombs for rent, selves for sale?
    Smith DH
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():23-36. PubMed ID: 11645611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sociobiology--another biological determinism.
    Science for the People. Sociobiology Study Group
    Bioscience; 1976 Mar; 26(3):182+. PubMed ID: 11649464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Donation, surrogacy and adoption.
    Page E
    J Appl Philos; 1985; 2(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 11655785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assisted reproductive technology and the family.
    Robertson JA
    Hastings Law J; 1996 Apr; 47(4):911-33. PubMed ID: 11656838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fertility for sale.
    Wright R; Gorney C; Silver LM; Coles R; Bartholet E; Arnold L
    N Y Times Web; 1998 Mar; ():A21. PubMed ID: 11647609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. British public will rule on fertility advances.
    Dillner L
    BMJ; 1994 Jan; 308(6922):153-4. PubMed ID: 11644506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.