151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645919)
1. In the Matter of Bentley. 25 Apr 1974.
District of Columbia. Superior Court
Dly Wash Law Report; 1974; 102(117):1221+, 17 Jun 1974. PubMed ID: 11645919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. Jackson: a recurring dilemma for health care providers in the treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses.
Bamberger DH
MD Law Rev; 1987; 46(3):514-32. PubMed ID: 11649934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Karen Quinlan case--a constitutional right to die?
Roddy JV
Chicago Bar Rec; 1976; 58(3):120-124+. PubMed ID: 11661598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Their life is in the blood: Jehovah's Witnesses, blood transfusions and the courts.
Moore ML
North KY Law Rev; 1983; 10(2):281-304. PubMed ID: 11649715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Wons v. Public Health Trust of Dade County.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 11644332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Malette v. Shulman: the requirement of consent in medical emergencies.
Siebrasse N
McGill Law J; 1989; 34(4):1080-98. PubMed ID: 11659256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The right to die: two sides to suicide.
Chambers RS; Hagstrom R
J Contemp Law; 1975; 1(2):234-45. PubMed ID: 11662358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The approach to the Jehovah's Witness patient.
Rothenberg DM
Anesthesiol Clin North Am; 1990 Sep; 8(3):589-607. PubMed ID: 11653928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Forced medication: by whose right?
Paris JJ
America (NY); 1975 Nov; 133(15):323-5. PubMed ID: 11664563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Religious beliefs and life saving therapy.
O'Rourke K
Health Care Ethics USA; 1997; 5(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11654840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Compulsory medical treatment and religious freedom: whose law shall prevail?
Paris JJ
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 11661287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The conflict between child's medical needs and parents' religious beliefs.
Probst JE
Am J Fam Law; 1990; 4(2):175-92. PubMed ID: 11652023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of incompetent child: parental wishes and Charter of Rights and Freedoms -- B. v. Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto.
Kennedy I
Med Law Rev; 1996; 4(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 11656916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Dubreuil: is an individual's right to refuse a blood transfusion contingent on parental status?
Bamonte JL; Bierman C
Nova Law Rev; 1992; 17(1):517-47. PubMed ID: 11659589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusion.
Watson SB
Clin Ethics Rep; 1991; 5(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 11653954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The right of a patient to refuse blood transfusions: a dilemma of conscience and law for patient, physician and hospital.
Silbermann BD
Univ San Fernando Valley Law Review; 1974; 3(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 11664351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Jehovah's Witness/blood transfusion dilemma.
O'Donnell TJ
Med Moral Newsl; 1982 Sep; 19(7):25-8. PubMed ID: 11649506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Transfusion refusal ruled mother's right.
Colen BD
Washington Post; 1974 Apr; ():B1+. PubMed ID: 11648657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Graham v. Deukmejian.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Fed Report; 1983 Aug; 713():518-20. PubMed ID: 11648160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Compulsory medical treatment of children: rights in conflict.
Dalcanton CL
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1973; 35(2):369-81. PubMed ID: 11664300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
