These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645934)

  • 1. McIntosh v. Milano. 12 Jun 1979.
    New Jersey. Superior Court, Law Division
    Atl Report; 1979; 403():500-15. PubMed ID: 11645934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judicial expansion of the Tarasoff doctrine: doctors' dilemma.
    Crocker EM
    J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(1-2):83-99. PubMed ID: 11658739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Untangling Tarasoff: Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California.
    Seligman BS
    Hastings Law J; 1977 Sep; 29(1):179-210. PubMed ID: 11661581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. 6 Jul 1973.
    California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1
    Wests Calif Report; 1973; 108():878-901. PubMed ID: 11646032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. 1 Jul 1976.
    California. Supreme Court, In Bank
    Wests Calif Report; 1976; 131():14-42. PubMed ID: 11646056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: psychotherapist's obligation of confidentiality versus the duty to warn.
    Nesbitt NA
    Tulsa Law J; 1977; 12(4):747-57. PubMed ID: 11661722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. 23 Dec 1974.
    California. Supreme Court
    Wests Calif Report; 1974; 118():129-45. PubMed ID: 11645905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tarasoff duty to warn discussed in three cases: no such duty found in Maryland.
    Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1980; 4(5):313-315. PubMed ID: 11661879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tarasoff, the doctrine of special relationships, and the psychotherapist's duty to warn.
    Schopp RF; Quattrocchi MR
    J Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(1):13-37. PubMed ID: 11649643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tarasoff at thirty: victim's knowledge shrinks the psychotherapist's duty to warn and protect.
    Ginsberg B
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2004; 21(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 15799533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A therapist's duty to potential victims: a nonthreatening view of Tarasoff.
    Leonard JB
    Law Hum Behav; 1977; 1(3):309-17. PubMed ID: 11661575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shaw v. Glickman. 13 Jun 1980.
    Maryland. Court of Special Appeals
    Atl Report; 1980; 415():625-31. PubMed ID: 11645940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Violent patients and the Tarasoff duty in private psychiatric practice.
    Beck JC
    J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(3-4):361-76. PubMed ID: 11649765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California--risk allocation in mental health care: whether to treat the patient or his victim.
    Lowe RH
    Utah Law Rev; 1975; 1975(2):553-69. PubMed ID: 11658320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evolution of Tarasoff: recent developments in the psychiatrist's duties to warn potential victims, protect the public, and predict dangerousness.
    Greenberg LT
    J Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):315-48. PubMed ID: 11658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lipari v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
    U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska
    Fed Suppl; 1980 Jul; 497():185-97. PubMed ID: 11648449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: the duty to warn--common law and statutory problems for California psychotherapists.
    Cohen RN
    Calif West Law Rev; 1978; 14(1):153-82. PubMed ID: 11664959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tort law--the psychiatric duty to warn: Cairl v. State, 323 N.W. 2d 20 (Minn. 1982).
    DeLaittre C
    Hamline Law Rev; 1983 Jul; 6(2):513-34. PubMed ID: 11658557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: psychotherapists, policemen and the duty to warn--an unreasonable extension of the common law?
    Kaplan RB
    Gold Gate Law Rev; 1975; 6(1):229-48. PubMed ID: 11661331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tarasoff and the dilemma of the dangerous patient: new directions for the 1990's.
    Perlin ML
    Law Psychol Rev; 1992; 16():29-63. PubMed ID: 11659689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.