These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645999)

  • 1. Caesar v. Mountanos. 13 Sep 1976.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1976; 542():1064-75. PubMed ID: 11645999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Roe v. Doe: a remedy for disclosure of psychiatric confidences.
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1975; 29(1):190-209. PubMed ID: 11664567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Constitutional privacy in psychotherapy.
    Smith SR
    George Washington Law Rev; 1980 Nov; 49(1):1-60. PubMed ID: 11658268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The patient or his victim: the therapist's dilemma.
    Fleming JG; Maximov B
    Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):1025-68. PubMed ID: 11663459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constitutional law--right of privacy--evidence law of privileges--the patient-litigant exception to the psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Christensen EL
    Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1977 Jun; 10(3):695-708. PubMed ID: 11664857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A perspective on confidentiality.
    Plaut EA
    Am J Psychiatry; 1974 Sep; 131(9):1021-4. PubMed ID: 4411708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Restrictions on the abortion rights of minors: Bellotti v. Baird.
    Harv Womens Law J; 1980; 3(1):119-39. PubMed ID: 11658352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developments in the law; privileged communications. IV. Medical and counseling privileges.
    Harv Law Rev; 1985 May; 98(7):1530-55. PubMed ID: 11645572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Confidentiality and patients' records: balancing the interests of society and the individual.
    Paul RE
    J Psychiatry Law; 1979; 7(1):49-70. PubMed ID: 11661746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The psychotherapist-patient privilege: are some patients more privileged than others?
    Stroube MK
    Pac Law J; 1979 Jul; 10(2):801-24. PubMed ID: 11661824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond Jaffee v. Redmond: should the federal courts recognize a right to physician-patient confidentiality?
    Silver SA
    Ohio State Law J; 1998; 58(5):1809-66. PubMed ID: 16211748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should there be a psychotherapist privilege in military courts-martial?
    Hayden DL
    Mil Law Rev; 1989; 123():31-107. PubMed ID: 11660232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
    Kudner KE
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The right of minors to confidential access to contraceptives.
    Morano AL
    Albany Law Rev; 1982; 47(1):214-40. PubMed ID: 11658598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Children's competence to provide informed consent for mental health treatment.
    Redding RE
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1993; 50(2):695-753. PubMed ID: 11656328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Commonwealth ex rel. Platt v. Platt.
    Pennsylvania. Superior Court
    Atl Report; 1979 May; 404():410-30. PubMed ID: 11648447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The poet, the biographer and the shrink: psychiatrist-patient confidentiality and the Anne Sexton biography.
    Carton S
    Univ Miami Entertain Sports Law Rev; 1993; 10(1-2):117-64. PubMed ID: 12091958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Justices uphold psychotherapy privacy rights.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():A1, A25. PubMed ID: 11648020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion regulation: the circumscription of state intervention by the doctrine of informed consent.
    Abbot L
    Georgia Law Rev; 1981; 15(3):681-713. PubMed ID: 11658321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constitutional law--privacy rights--consent requirements and abortions for minors.
    Crawford LD
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1981; 26(3):837-54. PubMed ID: 11658323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.