These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646030)
1. New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Rockefeller. 10 Apr 1973. U.S. District Court, Eastern District, New York Fed Suppl; 1973 Apr; 357():752-770. PubMed ID: 11646030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of the opinions in Donaldson v. O'Connor and Wyatt v. Aderholt. Friedman P Ment Retard Law; 1974 Nov; ():1-6. PubMed ID: 11686181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The "right to treatment": can the courts rehabilitate and cure? Miller HL Public Interest; 1977; (46):. PubMed ID: 11664773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Voluntarily confined mental retardates: the right to treatment vs. the right to protection from harm. Barshefsky C; Liebenberg R Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1974; 23(4):787-805. PubMed ID: 11664363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A new right to treatment. Fremouw WJ J Psychiatry Law; 1974; 2(1):7-32. PubMed ID: 11664337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right to protection from harm: legal justice for the mentally retarded? Albany Law Rev; 1974; 38(3):540-56. PubMed ID: 11664378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Constitution v. the snakepit. Goodman W N Y Times Mag; 1974 p 21+; 17 Mar 1974():. PubMed ID: 11664311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Romeo, Romeo, where art thou Romeo: before the court at the mercy of institutional professionals. Meyer SM; Soskin RM J Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(2):205-22. PubMed ID: 11658596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Youngberg v. Romeo. U.S. Supreme Court U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1982 Jun; 457():307-31. PubMed ID: 12041273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High court establishes rights for retarded in institutions. Barbash F Washington Post; 1982 Jun; ():A1, A5. PubMed ID: 11647762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The limits of liberty: deinstitutionalization, homelessness, and libertarian theory. Rhoden NK Emory Law J; 1982; 31(2):375-440. PubMed ID: 11653485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Wyatt v. Aderholt. 8 Nov 1974. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Fed Report; 1974; 503():1305-19. PubMed ID: 11646041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rights of institutionalized mental patients: issues, implications, and proposed guidelines. Wildgen JS Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):63-85. PubMed ID: 11663733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mental health law bibliography. Wade MD Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1974; 6(1):314-40. PubMed ID: 11661142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Federal court order brings big changes in lives of mentally ill and retarded patients in Alabama. Shils J Wall St J (East Ed); 1973 Dec; ():42. PubMed ID: 11649160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In search of a sane commitment statute. Treffert DA; Krajeck RW Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):56-57+. PubMed ID: 11662296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Postcommitment: an analysis and reevaluation of the right to treatment. Foianini RA Notre Dame Lawyer; 1975 Dec; 51(2):287-302. PubMed ID: 11664723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Romeo v. Youngberg. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1980 Nov; 644():147-86. PubMed ID: 11648465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]