These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The "legitimization" of artificial insemination: promise or problem? Knoppers BM Fam Law Rev; 1978 Apr; 1(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 11664957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Frustrated intentions and binding biology: seeking AID (Artificial Insemination by Donor) in the law. Schiff AR Duke Law J; 1994 Dec; 44(3):524-70. PubMed ID: 11660686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Conceiving for cash; is it legal?: a survey of the laws applicable to surrogate motherhood. Taylor S N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1987; 4(Part 2):413-44. PubMed ID: 11650203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Finding fathers: artificial insemination, lesbians, and the law. Arnup K Can J Women Law; 1994; 7(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 11660009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A medical advancement in search of a legal theory--artificial insemination by donor and the law. Baylson MM Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1987 Feb; 5(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 11658912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A close encounter of the first kind: artificial insemination and an enlightened judiciary. Smith GP J Fam Law; 1978; 17(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 11655401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sexuality, privacy and the new biology. Smith GP; Iraola R Marquette Law Rev; 1984; 67(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 11658703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New wine in old skins: using paternity-suit settlements to facilitate surrogate motherhood. Clark NL J Fam Law; 1987 Apr; 25(3):483-527. PubMed ID: 11658883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Austria: a legal ban on surrogate mothers and fathers? Bernat E; Straka U J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Spring; 31(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 11660068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Children conceived through artificial insemination. Connecticut Conn Gen Statut Annot Conn; 1976; Sections 49.69f to 49.69n():. PubMed ID: 12038422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Donor insemination (transsexual): parentage -- X, Y and Z v. United Kingdom. Grubb A Med Law Rev; 1998; 6(3):387-91. PubMed ID: 11658023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial insemination: a legislative remedy. Silvoso JA West State Univ Law Rev; 1975; 3(1):48-73. PubMed ID: 11665047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act. Abbas J Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Surrogate motherhood and the baby-selling laws. Katz A Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1986; 20(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11658800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Legal aspects of artificial human reproduction: can the law afford to play ostrich? Clapshaw D Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 4(3):254-72. PubMed ID: 11658651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. C.O. v. W.S. Ohio. Court of Common Pleas, Cuyahoga County, Juvenile Division North East Rep Second Ser; 1994 Mar; 639():523-5. PubMed ID: 12041261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artificial insemination by donor: information, communication and regulation. Gibson EL J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 11659440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]