These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646079)

  • 1. Halderman v. Pennhurst State School and Hospital. 23 Dec 1977.
    U.S. District Court, e.D. Pennsylvania
    Fed Suppl; 1977; 446():1295-329. PubMed ID: 11646079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mental health law--42 U.S.C. Section 6010 held not to create substantive rights in favor of mentally retarded: Pennhurst State School v. Halderman, 101 S.Ct. 1531 (1981).
    Calvey FL
    Marquette Law Rev; 1981; 65(1):156-66. PubMed ID: 11658449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Halderman v. Pennhurst State School and Hospital.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1979 Dec; 612():84-135. PubMed ID: 11648475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1981 Apr; 451():1-55. PubMed ID: 12041272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1984 Jan; 465():89-167. PubMed ID: 12041274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
    Ferleger D; Scott PM
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Romeo, Romeo, where art thou Romeo: before the court at the mercy of institutional professionals.
    Meyer SM; Soskin RM
    J Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(2):205-22. PubMed ID: 11658596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Romeo v. Youngberg.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1980 Nov; 644():147-86. PubMed ID: 11648465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High court establishes rights for retarded in institutions.
    Barbash F
    Washington Post; 1982 Jun; ():A1, A5. PubMed ID: 11647762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Youngberg v. Romeo.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1982 Jun; 457():307-31. PubMed ID: 12041273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protecting the rights of the mentally handicapped through the courts.
    Marker GR
    Child Care Q; 1973; 2(3):204-13. PubMed ID: 11662957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Granting rights to the retarded.
    Will GF
    Washington Post; 1982 Jun; ():C7. PubMed ID: 11647763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The "right to treatment": can the courts rehabilitate and cure?
    Miller HL
    Public Interest; 1977; (46):. PubMed ID: 11664773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wyatt v. Aderholt. 8 Nov 1974.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1974; 503():1305-19. PubMed ID: 11646041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Federal court order brings big changes in lives of mentally ill and retarded patients in Alabama.
    Shils J
    Wall St J (East Ed); 1973 Dec; ():42. PubMed ID: 11649160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Court considers case on mentally retarded.
    Nations Health; 1981 Feb; 11(2):1, 8. PubMed ID: 11658338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Justiciability and mental health.
    LaRue LH
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1975; 32(2):347-60. PubMed ID: 11662970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Postcommitment: an analysis and reevaluation of the right to treatment.
    Foianini RA
    Notre Dame Lawyer; 1975 Dec; 51(2):287-302. PubMed ID: 11664723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new right to treatment.
    Fremouw WJ
    J Psychiatry Law; 1974; 2(1):7-32. PubMed ID: 11664337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voluntarily confined mental retardates: the right to treatment vs. the right to protection from harm.
    Barshefsky C; Liebenberg R
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1974; 23(4):787-805. PubMed ID: 11664363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.