162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646097)
1. Rogers v. Okin. 29 Oct 1979.
U.S. District Court, D. Massachusetts
Fed Suppl; 1979; 478():1342-89. PubMed ID: 11646097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The forcible medication of involuntarily committed mental patients with antipsychotic drugs--Rogers v. Okin.
Robinson RM
Georgia Law Rev; 1981; 15(3):739-62. PubMed ID: 11658322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Rogers v. Okin.
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Fed Report; 1984 Jun; 738():1-9. PubMed ID: 11648487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rogers v. Okin.
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Fed Report; 1980 Nov; 634():650-64. PubMed ID: 11648463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Davis v. Hubbard.
U.S. District Court, N.D. Ohio, W.D
Fed Suppl; 1980 Sep; 506():915-44. PubMed ID: 11648474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right to refuse treatment: Commonwealth developments and issues.
Gordon R; Verdun-Jones SN
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6():57-73. PubMed ID: 11658523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The rights of the mentally ill during incarceration: the developing law.
Rastatter PC
Univ Fla Law Rev; 1973; 25(3):494-520. PubMed ID: 11664236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The 1983 revision of the Texas mental health code.
Dix GE
St Marys Law J; 1984; 16(1):41-153. PubMed ID: 11658786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Involuntary commitment and the right to refuse treatment with anti-psychotic drugs.
Hahn WA
Creighton Law Rev; 1982-1983; 16(3):719-42. PubMed ID: 11658455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Court bolsters mental patients' rights.
Herbert W
Sci News; 1982 Jun; 121(26):420. PubMed ID: 11658305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
Knepper K
Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rogers v. Commissioner of Department of Mental Health.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk
Mass Rep Mass Supreme Judic Court; 1983 Nov; 390():489-513. PubMed ID: 12041109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
Cort RS
UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court.
Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to refuse treatment: mental patients and the law.
Wade MD
Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1976; 1976(1):53-81. PubMed ID: 11664700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mental hospital drugging--atomistic and structural remedies.
Gelman S
Clevel State Law Rev; 1983-1984; 32(2):221-61. PubMed ID: 11658765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
Brooks AD
Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. United States v. Leatherman.
U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
Fed Suppl; 1983 Oct; 580():977-81. PubMed ID: 11648498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New York court says mentally ill have right to refuse medication.
Gross J
N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11646485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Stromberg CD; Stone AA
Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
