282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646134)
1. As they lay dying, Part 5--last of a series. Struggling to set standards: on decisions at life's edge.
Weiser B
Washington Post; 1983 Apr; ():A1, A18-19. PubMed ID: 11646134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. As they lay dying, Part 1. The doctor's agony: deciding to end life-saving therapy.
Weiser B
Washington Post; 1983 Apr; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11646130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. As they lay dying, Part 4. A final judgment on quality of life.
Weiser B
Washington Post; 1983 Apr; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 11646133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. As they lay dying, Part 2. The doctor's uncertain decisions.
Weiser B
Washington Post; 1983 Apr; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 11646132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Supportive care guidelines stir debate.
Sandrick K
Am Med News; 1984 May; 27(20):3, 11-13. PubMed ID: 11658530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. As they lay dying, Part 3. The 'orchestration' of a death.
Weiser B
Washington Post; 1983 Apr; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prolonging life: the new dilemma. Hospital care of the dying: each day, painful choices.
Kleiman D
N Y Times Web; 1985 Jan; ():A1, B4. PubMed ID: 11646147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Consumer sovereignty vs. informed consent: saying no to requests to "do everything" for dying patients.
Weber LJ
Bus Prof Ethics J; 1990; 9(3 and 4):95-102. PubMed ID: 11651037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Classification of critically ill patients: a legal examination.
Fama AJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1980 Oct; 24(3):514-33. PubMed ID: 11665253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Prolonging life: the new dilemma. Doctors ask, who lives? When to die?
Kleiman D
N Y Times Web; 1985 Jan; ():B1, B4. PubMed ID: 11646148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: implications for policy in 1985.
Cassel CK
Cardozo Law Rev; 1984; 6(2):287-302. PubMed ID: 11651801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Institutional ethics committee's roles, responsibilities, and benefits for physicians.
Minnesota Medical Association. Committee on Ethics and Medical-Legal Affairs
Minn Med; 1985 Aug; 68(8):605, 607-612. PubMed ID: 11643801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The case of Baby Rena: while child suffered, beliefs clashed.
Weiser B
Washington Post; 1991 Jul; ():A1, A6-7. PubMed ID: 11646243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
Barry RL
Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The withdrawal of treatment: the costs and benefits of guidelines.
Shannon TA
Bioethics Dig; 1978 Apr; 3(4):1-6. PubMed ID: 11660917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Lingering death from squamous cell carcinoma of the face.
Luce EA
Hosp Pract; 1989 Oct; 24(10A):60-61, 65-66, 71-72. PubMed ID: 11659235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical and legal issues in intensive care.
Paris JJ; Muir JC; Reardon FE
J Intensive Care Med; 1997; 12(6):298-309. PubMed ID: 11655319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Should services be rationed?
Felch WC; Ginzberg E; Young EW; Newman HN; Woodford DB
Internist; 1982 Oct; 23(8):4-13. PubMed ID: 11645482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Our discardable people.
Smith WJ
Hum Life Rev; 1998; 24(3):78-87. PubMed ID: 11657682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Withholding care from patients: Boston case asks who decides.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1995 Apr; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11647996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
