These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646178)
1. The total gene screen. Hunt M N Y Times Mag; 1986 Jan; ():33, 38, 50, 52+. PubMed ID: 11646178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic testing in the workplace. Rowinski L J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():375-413. PubMed ID: 11645613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The toxic workplace: Title VII protection for the potentially pregnant person. Andrade VM Harv Womens Law J; 1981; 4(1):71-105. PubMed ID: 11649449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Getting beyond discrimination: a regulatory solution to the problem of fetal hazards in the workplace. Buss E Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):577-98. PubMed ID: 11658700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Biological monitoring: the employer's dilemma. Miller FH Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):388-426. PubMed ID: 11644166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal protection and freedom of contract. Paul EF Public Aff Q; 1992 Jul; 6(3):305-26. PubMed ID: 11652079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ousted woman wins a suit under toxic chemical law. N Y Times Web; 1984 Aug; ():42. PubMed ID: 11646440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic discrimination in the workplace: an overview of existing protections. Kaufmann MB Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1999; 30(3):393-438. PubMed ID: 11658078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The evolution of the right to privacy after Roe v. Wade. Barnard D Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2 3):365-525. PubMed ID: 11659051 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic tests: can we afford the answers? Zoler ML Med World News; 1991 Jan; 32(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 11653931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. OSHRC rules sterilization is not an occupational hazard. Jameson R Trial; 1981 Jul; 17(7):6-7. PubMed ID: 11653563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Compensation for and prevention of occupational disease. American Public Health Association Am J Public Health; 1984 Mar; 74(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 11644114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biological monitoring and genetic screening in the industrial workplace: a synopsis and analysis. Field RI Law Med Health Care; 1983 Jun; 11(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 11644183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Protecting the baby: work in pregnancy poses legal frontier. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1988 Aug; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The DNA hard sell: a gene test may lead to discrimination. Wadman M N Y Times Web; 1996 Dec; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11647277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic privacy in employment. Resnik DB Public Aff Q; 1993 Jan; 7(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 11652102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic testing in the workplace: employer dream, employee nightmare -- legislative regulation in the United States and the Federal Republic of Germany. Deyerle KA Comp Labor Law J; 1997; 18(4):547-99. PubMed ID: 11657448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A legal research agenda for the Human Genome Initiative. Karjala DS Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(2):121-222. PubMed ID: 11659417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Shared interests: promoting healthy births without sacrificing women's liberty. Johnsen D Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):569-614. PubMed ID: 11652106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]