These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646229)

  • 21. Of gametes and guardians: the impropriety of appointing guardians ad litem for fetuses and embryos.
    Goldberg S
    Wash Law Rev; 1991 Apr; 66(2):503-44. PubMed ID: 11656073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest.
    Nelson LJ; Buggy BP; Weil CJ
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):703-63. PubMed ID: 11655855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution.
    Dawson TB
    Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Legal frameworks to prevent harm in-utero.
    Bewley S
    Med Law Int; 1994; 1(3):277-87. PubMed ID: 11652958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Re F (In Utero).
    Morgan D
    J Soc Welfare Law; 1988; No. 3():197-202. PubMed ID: 11659077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Justifying the rights of pregnancy: the interest view.
    Marquis D
    Crim Justice Ethics; 1994; 13(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 11656383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Substance abuse during pregnancy.
    Moss K
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():278-99. PubMed ID: 11656055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Whose foetus is it?
    Wells C; Morgan D
    J Law Soc; 1991; 18(4):431-47. PubMed ID: 11656222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mama vs. fetus.
    Hornick HL
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1993; 39(4):536-69. PubMed ID: 11659785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Criminal liability for fetal endangerment: editor's introduction.
    Kleinig J
    Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 11650906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The legal status of the unborn after Webster.
    Parness JA
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adventures in babysitting: gestational surrogate mother tort liability.
    Bussel KA
    Duke Law J; 1991 Dec; 41(3):661-90. PubMed ID: 11659580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color.
    Krauss DJ
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1991; 26(2):523-47. PubMed ID: 11652068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prenatal drug exposure: the constitutional implications of three governmental approaches.
    Smith GB; Dabiri GM
    Const Law J; 1991; 2(1):53-126. PubMed ID: 12083093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Legal issues: drug testing of postpartum women and newborns as the basis for civil and criminal proceedings.
    Moss KL
    Clgh Rev; 1990 Mar; 23(11):1406-14. PubMed ID: 11659232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Arming the pregnancy police: more outlandish concoctions?
    Parness JA
    LA Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 53(2):427-48. PubMed ID: 11657119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The maternal abdominal wall: a fortress against fetal health care?
    Phelan JP
    South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):461-90. PubMed ID: 11645842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. When becoming pregnant is a crime.
    Paltrow LM
    Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 11650910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A new crime, fetal neglect: state intervention to protect the unborn--protection at what cost?
    Manson R; Marolt J
    Calif West Law Rev; 1987-1988; 24(1):161-82. PubMed ID: 11650070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
    Gallagher J
    Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.