204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646243)
1. The case of Baby Rena: while child suffered, beliefs clashed.
Weiser B
Washington Post; 1991 Jul; ():A1, A6-7. PubMed ID: 11646243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The case of Baby Rena: a question of letting go Who should decide when treatment is futile?
Weiser B
Washington Post; 1991 Jul; ():A1, A18-19. PubMed ID: 11646242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Stopping treatment on grounds of futility: a role for institutional policy.
Stell LK
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):481-97. PubMed ID: 11652704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Baby's death in '92 still being fought: parents sue hospital over shutdown of life support equipment.
Bruni F
N Y Times Web; 1996 Mar; ():6. PubMed ID: 11647122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Deciding whether the baby lives.
Curran M
Washington Post; 1985 May; ():Health Su-17. PubMed ID: 11646285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Balancing wishes with wisdom: sustaining infant life.
Wakefield-Fisher M
Nurs Health Care; 1987 Nov; 8(9):517-20. PubMed ID: 11644099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Court order to treat baby with partial brain prompts debate on costs and ethics.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1994 Feb; ():20. PubMed ID: 11647018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. As family protests, hospital seeks an end to woman's life support.
Belkin L
N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A1, D22. PubMed ID: 11646800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The recent amendments to the Texas Natural Death Act: implications for health care providers.
Greenfield RE
St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):1003-51. PubMed ID: 11652489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
Bopp J; Coleson RE
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
Smith SR
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Surrogate decision making for mentally incapacitated adults.
Nelson LJ; Golenski JD
Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Feb-Mar-Apr; 1(2 3 & 4):1-28. PubMed ID: 11650108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. As they lay dying, Part 5--last of a series. Struggling to set standards: on decisions at life's edge.
Weiser B
Washington Post; 1983 Apr; ():A1, A18-19. PubMed ID: 11646134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In re L.H.R.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 11644498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Confusion over the language of the Baby Doe regulations.
Bermel J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Dec; 16(6):2. PubMed ID: 11643944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts.
Rhoden NK
South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of life, sanctity of creation: palliative or apotheosis?
Smith GP
Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):709-40. PubMed ID: 11652479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. MDs, lawyers probe ethical, legal issues in ending treatment.
Bolsen B
Am Med News; 1984 Apr; 27(13):11-3. PubMed ID: 11653535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
Barry RL
Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In the Matter of Karen Quinlan. 31 Mar 1976.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1976; 355():647-72. PubMed ID: 11646053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
