These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Unemancipated minors' rights of access to contraceptives without parental consent or notice--the squeal rule and beyond. Best M Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 1983; 8(2):219-50. PubMed ID: 11658756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Parental notification requirements and administrative law II. Healey JM Conn Med; 1983 May; 47(5):307. PubMed ID: 11644008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Squelching the squeal rule. Kilpatrick JJ Washington Post; 1983 Feb; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers. Wardle LD Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reagan administration decides not to appeal "squeal rule" defeat. Ob Gyn News; 1984 Feb 1-14; 19(3):3, 36. PubMed ID: 11653544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Planned Parenthood Federation of America v. Heckler. U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit Fed Report; 1983 Jul; 712():650-68. PubMed ID: 11648204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Govt. tells birth control clinics: notify teens' parents. Wood AP Ob Gyn News; 1983 Feb 15-28; 18(4):1, 22-23. PubMed ID: 11653469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. State of New York v. Schweiker. U.S. District Court, S.D. New York Fed Suppl; 1983 Feb; 557():354-63. PubMed ID: 11648206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parental notification requirements applicable to projects for family planning services; final rule. U.S. Public Health Service Fed Regist; 1983 Jan; 48(18):3600-14. PubMed ID: 11645488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Minors' rights to confidential contraceptive services: the limits of state power. Paul EW; Klassel D Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11658948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. H.L. v. Matheson and the right of minors to seek abortions. Wolff MH; Hawn RH Calif West Law Rev; 1982; 19(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Lawsuit seeks to bar U.S. from access to AIDS files. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1996 Apr; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11647112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Proposed parent notification plan draws criticism. Wood AP Ob Gyn News; 1982 Mar 1-14; 17(5):1, 18-19. PubMed ID: 11654880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Teens left with many options despite 'squeal rule'. Ob Gyn News; 1983 Jul 1-14; 18(13):36. PubMed ID: 11658369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. U.S. abortion rule is upheld by judge. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1988 Jul; ():46. PubMed ID: 11647389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]