These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646274)

  • 1. Discrimination and Baby Jane.
    Will GF
    Washington Post; 1983 Dec; ():A23. PubMed ID: 11646274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Whatever may happen to Baby Jane.
    Robinson DN
    Washington Post; 1983 Dec; ():C7. PubMed ID: 11646272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Baby Jane Doe: readers' responses.
    Marzen TJ; Uddo BJ
    America (NY); 1984 Feb; 150(5):93-4. PubMed ID: 11658403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ; Balch BJ
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should every Baby Doe die?
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():B5. PubMed ID: 11646281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Baby Jane.
    Cohen R
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():B1. PubMed ID: 11646270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Life, death and the rights of handicapped babies.
    Schmeck HM
    N Y Times Web; 1985 Jun; ():C1, C3. PubMed ID: 11646493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regulating Baby Doe.
    Goodman E
    Washington Post; 1983 Mar; ():A23. PubMed ID: 11646280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judge rejects U.S. role in 'Baby Doe' case.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A33. PubMed ID: 11646343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Baby Jane Doe: the ethical issues.
    Conley JJ
    America (NY); 1984 Feb; 150(5):84-9. PubMed ID: 11658402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. U.S. lawyer concedes point in 'Doe' case.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Dec; ():A8. PubMed ID: 11646341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 'Baby Doe': it's not a 'medical' question.
    Arkes H
    Washington Post; 1983 Apr; ():D7. PubMed ID: 11646131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 'Baby Jane' ruling appealed by Justice.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A5. PubMed ID: 11646367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Life and death and the handicapped newborn.
    Koop CE
    Ethics Med; 1987; 3(3):39-44. PubMed ID: 11651893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. U.S. seeks records of 'Baby Jane Doe'.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decision to pursue Baby Doe case born in confusion at HHS.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Dec; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Baby Jane Doe.
    America (NY); 1983 Nov; 149(16):302-3. PubMed ID: 11658405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The future of Baby Doe.
    Singer P; Kuhse H
    New York Rev Books; 1984 Mar; 31(3):17-22. PubMed ID: 11658414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Baby Doe and local option.
    Hentoff N
    Washington Post; 1984 Jun; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beyond state intervention in the family: for Baby Jane Doe.
    Minow M
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1985; 18(4):933-1014. PubMed ID: 11655183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.