These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646278)

  • 1. 'Infant Doe': a hospital ethics committee can help.
    Capron AM
    Washington Post; 1983 Apr; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Another court challenge predicted following revised 'Baby Doe' rule.
    Med World News; 1983 Jul; 24(14):54, 59. PubMed ID: 11645668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 'Baby Doe' may be undone.
    Caplan AL
    N Y Times Web; 1985 Feb; ():23. PubMed ID: 11646288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
    Kuzma AL
    Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protecting handicapped infants.
    Washington Post; 1984 Dec; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11646438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suit emphasizes drawbacks of 'Baby Doe' rules.
    Am Med News; 1984 Mar 23-30; 27(12):4. PubMed ID: 11646355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health care groups favor local 'Baby Doe' review.
    Med World News; 1983 Sep; 24(18):9. PubMed ID: 11645497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails.
    Curran M
    Ob Gyn News; 1983 Dec 15-31; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey.
    Sarno JJ
    Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Koop acted as midwife for new 'Baby Doe' rule.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1984 Jan; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The "Baby Doe" legislation: its rise and fall.
    Moss K
    Policy Stud J; 1987 Jun; 15(4):629-51. PubMed ID: 11651898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The future of Baby Doe.
    Singer P; Kuhse H
    New York Rev Books; 1984 Mar; 31(3):17-22. PubMed ID: 11658414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. United States: treatment of severely handicapped infants.
    Lancet; 1983 Oct; 2(8356):960-1. PubMed ID: 11644271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
    Smith SR
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Baby Doe's rights.
    Hentoff N
    Washington Post; 1984 Feb; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Baby Doe cases: compromise and moral dilemma.
    Haddon PA
    Emory Law J; 1985; 34(3-4):545-615. PubMed ID: 11658790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Who should make medical decisions?
    Genel M
    Conn Med; 1984 Aug; 48(8):547-8. PubMed ID: 11644157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention.
    Riga PJ
    Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recent governmental action regarding the treatment of seriously ill newborns.
    Lawton SE; Carder EB; Weisman AW
    J Coll Univ Law; 1985; 11(4):405-16. PubMed ID: 11651864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. HHS orders treatment for 'Baby Doe' infants.
    Washington Post; 1985 Apr; ():A17. PubMed ID: 11646429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.