These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646288)

  • 1. 'Baby Doe' may be undone.
    Caplan AL
    N Y Times Web; 1985 Feb; ():23. PubMed ID: 11646288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 'Infant Doe': a hospital ethics committee can help.
    Capron AM
    Washington Post; 1983 Apr; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Another court challenge predicted following revised 'Baby Doe' rule.
    Med World News; 1983 Jul; 24(14):54, 59. PubMed ID: 11645668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Koop acted as midwife for new 'Baby Doe' rule.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1984 Jan; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protecting handicapped infants.
    Washington Post; 1984 Dec; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11646438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
    Shapiro RS; Barthel R
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
    Kuzma AL
    Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suit emphasizes drawbacks of 'Baby Doe' rules.
    Am Med News; 1984 Mar 23-30; 27(12):4. PubMed ID: 11646355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails.
    Curran M
    Ob Gyn News; 1983 Dec 15-31; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health care groups favor local 'Baby Doe' review.
    Med World News; 1983 Sep; 24(18):9. PubMed ID: 11645497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Baby Doe and local option.
    Hentoff N
    Washington Post; 1984 Jun; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ; Balch BJ
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Baby Doe cases: compromise and moral dilemma.
    Haddon PA
    Emory Law J; 1985; 34(3-4):545-615. PubMed ID: 11658790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Baby Doe's rights.
    Hentoff N
    Washington Post; 1984 Feb; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. HHS orders treatment for 'Baby Doe' infants.
    Washington Post; 1985 Apr; ():A17. PubMed ID: 11646429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 'Baby Doe': it's not a 'medical' question.
    Arkes H
    Washington Post; 1983 Apr; ():D7. PubMed ID: 11646131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The "Baby Doe" legislation: its rise and fall.
    Moss K
    Policy Stud J; 1987 Jun; 15(4):629-51. PubMed ID: 11651898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model Procedures for Child Protective Service Agencies Responding to Reports of Withholding Medically Indicated Treatment from Disabled Infants with Life-Threatening Conditions.
    Nicholson EB; Horowitz RM; Parry J; ;
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(3):221-49. PubMed ID: 11651933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decision to pursue Baby Doe case born in confusion at HHS.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Dec; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Balancing wishes with wisdom: sustaining infant life.
    Wakefield-Fisher M
    Nurs Health Care; 1987 Nov; 8(9):517-20. PubMed ID: 11644099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.