411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646322)
1. Court allows holding of mental patients who may cause trouble.
Sullivan R
N Y Times Web; 1994 Dec; ():59. PubMed ID: 11646322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Civil rights and the mentally ill: revolution in bedlam.
Offir CW
Psychol Today; 1974 Oct; 8(5):60-62+. PubMed ID: 11664431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. United States Supreme Court and psychiatry: a critical look.
Malmquist CP
J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(1-2):137-64. PubMed ID: 11658821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values.
Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right to be crazy.
Isaac RJ; Armat VC
Am Enterp; 1990; 1(5):34-42. PubMed ID: 11659838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Stromberg CD; Stone AA
Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. New York court says mentally ill have right to refuse medication.
Gross J
N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11646485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Law and the mentally ill.
Tanay E
Wayne Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 22(3):781-813. PubMed ID: 11664634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The mentally ill homeless: evolving involuntary commitment issues.
Ludwig EV
Villanova Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 36(5):1085-111. PubMed ID: 11659576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
Belzer I
UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The continuum of coercion: constitutional and clinical considerations in the treatment of mentally disordered persons.
Miller RD
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1997; 74(4):1169-214. PubMed ID: 11660618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Albany debates plan to force treatment on the mentally ill.
Hernandez R
N Y Times Web; 1999 Jul; ():20. PubMed ID: 11648128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Constitutionally guaranteed rights of the mentally ill.
Cazalas M
South Univ Law Rev; 1975; 2(1):9-38. PubMed ID: 12083089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. "Crazy" until proven innocent? Civil commitment of the mentally ill homeless.
Kaufman MS
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1988; 19(2):333-67. PubMed ID: 11659184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Open Sesame: the Constitution and mental institutions.
Trotter RJ
Sci News; 1975 Jul; 108(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 11664469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
Brooks AD
Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. United States v. Leatherman.
U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
Fed Suppl; 1983 Oct; 580():977-81. PubMed ID: 11648498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. State in Interest of R.G.W. 20 Oct 1976.
New Jersey. Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court, Passaic County
Atl Report; 1976; 366():1375-85. PubMed ID: 11645914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
