These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646342)

  • 1. Decision to pursue Baby Doe case born in confusion at HHS.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Dec; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judge rejects U.S. role in 'Baby Doe' case.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A33. PubMed ID: 11646343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meese approved intervention in baby case.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11646345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ; Balch BJ
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. U.S. lawyer concedes point in 'Doe' case.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Dec; ():A8. PubMed ID: 11646341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. U.S. seeks records of 'Baby Jane Doe'.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 'Baby Jane' ruling appealed by Justice.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A5. PubMed ID: 11646367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails.
    Curran M
    Ob Gyn News; 1983 Dec 15-31; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 'Baby Doe' proposed reg suffers setback in court.
    Med World News; 1983 Dec; 24(23):27. PubMed ID: 11645566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What ever happened to Baby Jane...Doe?
    Jolly CM
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1987; 14(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 11651891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Baby Jane.
    Cohen R
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():B1. PubMed ID: 11646270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 'Baby Doe' may be undone.
    Caplan AL
    N Y Times Web; 1985 Feb; ():23. PubMed ID: 11646288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forgoing treatment of critically ill newborns and the legal legacy of Baby Doe.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1992; 6(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. HHS orders treatment for 'Baby Doe' infants.
    Washington Post; 1985 Apr; ():A17. PubMed ID: 11646429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should every Baby Doe die?
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():B5. PubMed ID: 11646281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe.
    Drinan RF
    America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beyond state intervention in the family: for Baby Jane Doe.
    Minow M
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1985; 18(4):933-1014. PubMed ID: 11655183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The future of Baby Doe.
    Singer P; Kuhse H
    New York Rev Books; 1984 Mar; 31(3):17-22. PubMed ID: 11658414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
    Kuzma AL
    Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brain-damaged baby dies amid court fight over treatment.
    Hilts PJ
    Washington Post; 1983 Apr; ():A2. PubMed ID: 11646279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.