These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646353)

  • 1. Lawsuit challenges 'Baby Doe' regulation.
    Am Med News; 1984 Mar 23-30; 27(12):1, 7. PubMed ID: 11646353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Another court challenge predicted following revised 'Baby Doe' rule.
    Med World News; 1983 Jul; 24(14):54, 59. PubMed ID: 11645668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Suit emphasizes drawbacks of 'Baby Doe' rules.
    Am Med News; 1984 Mar 23-30; 27(12):4. PubMed ID: 11646355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Health care groups favor local 'Baby Doe' review.
    Med World News; 1983 Sep; 24(18):9. PubMed ID: 11645497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails.
    Curran M
    Ob Gyn News; 1983 Dec 15-31; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ; Balch BJ
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 'Infant Doe': a hospital ethics committee can help.
    Capron AM
    Washington Post; 1983 Apr; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ACOG, AMA object to new 'Baby Doe' rule.
    Curran M
    Ob Gyn News; 1984 Feb 15-29; 19(4):3, 42. PubMed ID: 11653543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. If not that way, what way?
    America (NY); 1986 Jul; 155(2):21. PubMed ID: 11658787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
    Kuzma AL
    Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgery and the rights of children with handicaps.
    Kugel RB
    N Y Med Q; 1985; 5(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 11650764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Groups seek to force new 'Baby Doe' laws.
    Med World News; 1984 Jun; 25(12):14. PubMed ID: 11645514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Who should make medical decisions?
    Genel M
    Conn Med; 1984 Aug; 48(8):547-8. PubMed ID: 11644157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent governmental action regarding the treatment of seriously ill newborns.
    Lawton SE; Carder EB; Weisman AW
    J Coll Univ Law; 1985; 11(4):405-16. PubMed ID: 11651864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Baby Doe and local option.
    Hentoff N
    Washington Post; 1984 Jun; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe.
    Drinan RF
    America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 'Baby Doe' proposed reg suffers setback in court.
    Med World News; 1983 Dec; 24(23):27. PubMed ID: 11645566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 'Baby Doe' may be undone.
    Caplan AL
    N Y Times Web; 1985 Feb; ():23. PubMed ID: 11646288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bowen v. American Hospital Association: federal regulation is powerless to save Baby Doe.
    Cantrell DF
    Indiana Law Rev; 1986; 19(4):1199-218. PubMed ID: 11650766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. U.S. judge outlaws 'Baby Doe' rules.
    Hilts PJ
    Washington Post; 1984 May; ():A2. PubMed ID: 11646378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.