230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646355)
1. Suit emphasizes drawbacks of 'Baby Doe' rules.
Am Med News; 1984 Mar 23-30; 27(12):4. PubMed ID: 11646355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Another court challenge predicted following revised 'Baby Doe' rule.
Med World News; 1983 Jul; 24(14):54, 59. PubMed ID: 11645668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails.
Curran M
Ob Gyn News; 1983 Dec 15-31; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. 'Baby Doe' may be undone.
Caplan AL
N Y Times Web; 1985 Feb; ():23. PubMed ID: 11646288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Health care groups favor local 'Baby Doe' review.
Med World News; 1983 Sep; 24(18):9. PubMed ID: 11645497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 'Infant Doe': a hospital ethics committee can help.
Capron AM
Washington Post; 1983 Apr; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Lawsuit challenges 'Baby Doe' regulation.
Am Med News; 1984 Mar 23-30; 27(12):1, 7. PubMed ID: 11646353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Who should make medical decisions?
Genel M
Conn Med; 1984 Aug; 48(8):547-8. PubMed ID: 11644157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention.
Riga PJ
Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. If not that way, what way?
America (NY); 1986 Jul; 155(2):21. PubMed ID: 11658787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
Kuzma AL
Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. 'Baby Doe' rules sanction child abuse in the critical care nursery.
Del Giudice S
Med World News; 1984 Feb; 25(4):122. PubMed ID: 11645509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The legacy of Baby Doe: five perspectives.
Ciulla JB
Psychol Today; 1987 Jan; 21(1):70-71, 74-75. PubMed ID: 11658812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
Shapiro RS; Barthel R
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Baby Jane Doe.
America (NY); 1983 Nov; 149(16):302-3. PubMed ID: 11658405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Amendments to Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act. Public Law 98-457.
United States
US Statut Large; 1984; 98(Title I Sections 101a-312a):. PubMed ID: 11686171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Model Procedures for Child Protective Service Agencies Responding to Reports of Withholding Medically Indicated Treatment from Disabled Infants with Life-Threatening Conditions.
Nicholson EB; Horowitz RM; Parry J; ;
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(3):221-49. PubMed ID: 11651933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Baby Doe and local option.
Hentoff N
Washington Post; 1984 Jun; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Legal perspectives on institutional ethics committees.
Capron AM
J Coll Univ Law; 1985; 11(4):417-31. PubMed ID: 11651865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethics committee guidelines issued.
Krieger L
Am Med News; 1984 May; 27(18):1, 34. PubMed ID: 11646386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
