BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646411)

  • 1. Life-and-death decisions.
    Washington Post; 1985 Jan; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11646411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bartling v. Superior Court.
    California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 5
    Wests Calif Report; 1984 Dec; 209():220-7. PubMed ID: 11648164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Euthanasia and self determinism: is there a Charter right to die in Canada?
    Carnerie F
    McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):299-335. PubMed ID: 11649872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part I.
    Solnick PB
    Med Law; 1984 Sep; 3(4):303-32. PubMed ID: 11651779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die.
    Zaremba JF
    Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative.
    Tomlinson AK
    Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
    Buchanan AE
    UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
    Colabrese CA
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A proposed amendment to the California Natural Death Act to assure the statutory right to control life sustaining treatment decisions.
    Clementino BJ
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):579-609. PubMed ID: 11649789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision.
    Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R
    KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Damage actions for nonconsensual life-sustaining medical treatment.
    Dooling RP
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):895-918. PubMed ID: 11649881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is there a right to die?
    Grad FP
    Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1976; 12(4):489-529. PubMed ID: 11663026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The legal logic of euthanasia.
    Uhlmann MM
    First Things; 1996; 64():39-43. PubMed ID: 11654467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From medicalization to legalization to politicization: O'Connor, Cruzan, and refusal of treatment in the 1990s.
    Johnson SH
    Conn Law Rev; 1989; 21(3):685-722. PubMed ID: 11650431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assisted suicide: the philosophers' brief.
    Dworkin R; Nagel T; Nozick R; Rawls J; Scanlon T; Thomson JJ
    New York Rev Books; 1997 Mar; ():41-7. PubMed ID: 11655210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is there a constitutional right to die?
    Wickett A
    Euthan Rev; 1986; 1(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 11649799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dying woman wins Jersey ruling to end life-sustaining care.
    Sullivan R
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():B1, B2. PubMed ID: 11647812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical decisionmaking for incompetent persons: the Massachusetts substituted judgment model.
    Dunphy SM; Cross JH
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):153-67. PubMed ID: 11649910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Therefore, choose death.
    Brown ML
    Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. United States--life support: one firm decision.
    Lancet; 1985 Jan; 1(8421):157. PubMed ID: 11644477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.