206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646422)
1. Fraud by scientists seen linked to competition.
Russell C
Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A8. PubMed ID: 11646422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fraud and sloppiness in science.
Schmaus W
Perspectives Prof; 1981; 1(3-4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A social control perspective on scientific misconduct.
Hackett EJ
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):242-60. PubMed ID: 11653363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The scientific community perspective on research integrity.
Teich AH
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):117-22. PubMed ID: 11652291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 2: why does fraud happen and what are its effects?
Garfield E
Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(15):3-10. PubMed ID: 11649943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fraud will out--or will it?
Tangney JP
New Sci; 1987 Aug; 115(1572):62-3. PubMed ID: 11645775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
Sise CB
San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Teaching scientific integrity.
Gifford F
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 11656760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific misconduct: undue process.
Efron R
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):223-38. PubMed ID: 11652297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research universities and scientific misconduct -- history, policies, and the future.
Steneck NH
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):310-30. PubMed ID: 11653367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Process and detection in fraud and deceit.
Silverman S
Ethics Behav; 1994; 4(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 11652795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On being an authentic scientist.
Smith ML
IRB; 1992; 14(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose rights?
Schmaus W; Wigodsky HS
IRB; 1984; 6(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 11650663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fraud in science.
S Afr Med J; 1983 Aug; 64(6):190-1. PubMed ID: 11644034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Move to make it harder to fabricate medical research.
Med World News; 1983 Jan; 24(2):17, 21. PubMed ID: 11645487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical school guidelines for investigating misconduct and fraud in science.
Annau Z
Account Res; 1992; 2(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 11653980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science.
LaFollette MC
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
