250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646438)
1. Protecting handicapped infants.
Washington Post; 1984 Dec; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11646438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. 'Baby Doe' may be undone.
Caplan AL
N Y Times Web; 1985 Feb; ():23. PubMed ID: 11646288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. 'Infant Doe': a hospital ethics committee can help.
Capron AM
Washington Post; 1983 Apr; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap; procedures and guidelines relating to health care for handicapped infants.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Secretary
Fed Regist; 1984 Jan; 48(8):1622-54. PubMed ID: 11655570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Life, death and the rights of handicapped babies.
Schmeck HM
N Y Times Web; 1985 Jun; ():C1, C3. PubMed ID: 11646493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. If not that way, what way?
America (NY); 1986 Jul; 155(2):21. PubMed ID: 11658787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. United States: treatment of severely handicapped infants.
Lancet; 1983 Oct; 2(8356):960-1. PubMed ID: 11644271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
Kuzma AL
Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Baby Doe and local option.
Hentoff N
Washington Post; 1984 Jun; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Model Procedures for Child Protective Service Agencies Responding to Reports of Withholding Medically Indicated Treatment from Disabled Infants with Life-Threatening Conditions.
Nicholson EB; Horowitz RM; Parry J; ;
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(3):221-49. PubMed ID: 11651933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Who should make medical decisions?
Genel M
Conn Med; 1984 Aug; 48(8):547-8. PubMed ID: 11644157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Another court challenge predicted following revised 'Baby Doe' rule.
Med World News; 1983 Jul; 24(14):54, 59. PubMed ID: 11645668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
Shapiro RS; Barthel R
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention.
Riga PJ
Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey.
Sarno JJ
Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Balancing wishes with wisdom: sustaining infant life.
Wakefield-Fisher M
Nurs Health Care; 1987 Nov; 8(9):517-20. PubMed ID: 11644099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Big Brother in the nursery.
Avery GB
Washington Post; 1983 Mar; ():A25. PubMed ID: 11646276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Regulating Baby Doe.
Goodman E
Washington Post; 1983 Mar; ():A23. PubMed ID: 11646280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Life and death decisions in the nursery: standards and procedures for withholding lifesaving treatment from infants.
Smith SR
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1125-86. PubMed ID: 11651775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The plight of the genetically handicapped newborn: a comparative analysis.
Smith GP
Holdsworth Law Rev; 1984; 9(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 12091924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
