135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646440)
1. Ousted woman wins a suit under toxic chemical law.
N Y Times Web; 1984 Aug; ():42. PubMed ID: 11646440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The toxic workplace: Title VII protection for the potentially pregnant person.
Andrade VM
Harv Womens Law J; 1981; 4(1):71-105. PubMed ID: 11649449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Getting beyond discrimination: a regulatory solution to the problem of fetal hazards in the workplace.
Buss E
Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):577-98. PubMed ID: 11658700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biological monitoring: the employer's dilemma.
Miller FH
Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):388-426. PubMed ID: 11644166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Protecting the baby: work in pregnancy poses legal frontier.
Lewin T
N Y Times Web; 1988 Aug; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Towards a practical implementation of the abortion decision: the interests of the physician, the woman and the fetus.
Sebek M
De Paul Law Rev; 1976; 25(3):676-706. PubMed ID: 11664630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal protection programs under Title VII--rebutting the procreation assumption.
Blanco AC
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1985; 46(3):755-94. PubMed ID: 11649206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Compensation for and prevention of occupational disease.
American Public Health Association
Am J Public Health; 1984 Mar; 74(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 11644114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Constitutional law: Pennsylvania's wrongful birth statute's impact on abortion rights: state action and undue burden -- Edmonds v. Western Pennsylvania Hospital Radiology Associates.
Silverman AM
Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1087-105. PubMed ID: 11659883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The total gene screen.
Hunt M
N Y Times Mag; 1986 Jan; ():33, 38, 50, 52+. PubMed ID: 11646178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mississippi law fails to reduce abortion strife.
Applebome P
N Y Times Web; 1992 Oct; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. AIDS in the workplace: public and corporate policy.
Heacock MV; Orvis GP
Harv J Law Public Policy; 1990; 13(2):689-713. PubMed ID: 11656268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Prenatal exposure to fetally toxic work environments: the dilemma of the 1978 Pregnancy Amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Furnish HA
Iowa Law Rev; 1980 Oct; 66(1):63-129. PubMed ID: 11661992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent civil actions for post-abortion psychological trauma.
Eller TR
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1996; 71(4):639-70. PubMed ID: 11660407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies.
Sangree S
Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. AIDS discrimination under federal, state, and local law after Arline.
Wasson RP
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1987; 15(2):221-78. PubMed ID: 11658972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hope v. Perales: expanding medically necessary abortion rights of pregnant indigent women under New York and Nebraska state constitutional due process clauses.
Brown M
Neb Law Rev; 1993; 72(2):586-607. PubMed ID: 11656347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion law fight turns to rights of teen-agers.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():1, 23. PubMed ID: 11647866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Criminal abortion revisited.
Buell SW
N Y Univ Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 66(6):1774-831. PubMed ID: 11652642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Discharge of professional employees: protecting against dismissal for acts within a professional code of ethics.
Feliu AG
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1979-1980 Fall-Winter; 11(2):149-87. PubMed ID: 11658452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
