136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646463)
1. End of tube feeding of comatose patient asked in Jersey case.
Sullivan R
N Y Times Web; 1985 Oct; ():A1, B4. PubMed ID: 11646463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Peter.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1987 Jun; 529():419-34. PubMed ID: 11648264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Jersey advocate sees a peril in life-support cases.
Sullivan JF
N Y Times Web; 1986 Nov; ():B5. PubMed ID: 11646539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Conroy: forging a path to death with dignity.
Agrawal A
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 67(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 11649960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ombudsman bars food-tube removal.
Sullivan R
N Y Times Web; 1986 Mar; ():B2. PubMed ID: 11646515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Wishes of patient in refusing care backed in Jersey.
Sullivan JF
N Y Times Web; 1987 Jun; ():A1, B12. PubMed ID: 11647828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Judge sanctions end of feeding in a coma case.
Sullivan R
N Y Times Web; 1986 Apr; ():B3. PubMed ID: 11646514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill.
Eisenberg KG
Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comatose woman's family presses food-tube removal.
Sullivan R
N Y Times Web; 1986 Mar; ():B2. PubMed ID: 11646499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonfeeding: lawful killing in CA, homicide in NJ.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Dec; 13(6):19-20. PubMed ID: 11644094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act.
New Jersey
N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Natural death: an alternative in New Jersey.
Levant S
Georgetown Law J; 1985 Jun; 73(5):1331-54. PubMed ID: 11651811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis.
Krasik EB
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. New York rule compounds dilemma over life support.
Belkin L
N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A1, B4. PubMed ID: 11646928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In right-to-die fight, court finds family liable for care.
Belkin L
N Y Times Web; 1992 Sep; ():B6. PubMed ID: 11646935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Woman in right-to-die case dies after removal of tube.
N Y Times Web; 1987 Dec; ():B2. PubMed ID: 11646622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ends and means of life: the Supreme Court and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration.
Feenan D
J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(5):152, 151. PubMed ID: 11657627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comatose man's family seeks removal of his feeding tube.
Feron J
N Y Times Web; 1987 Apr; ():33. PubMed ID: 11646572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Living wills: the need for uniform state laws.
Warnock HC
Probate Prop; 1991; 5(3):52-6. PubMed ID: 11652620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
