These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Views on surrogacy harden after Baby M ruling. Barron J N Y Times Web; 1987 Apr; ():A1, B2. PubMed ID: 11646559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Touchdowns, toddlers, and taboos: on paying college athletes and surrogate contract mothers. Rush SE Ariz Law Rev; 1989; 31(3):549-614. PubMed ID: 11659320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproductive technology and intent-based parenthood: an opportunity for gender neutrality. Shultz MM Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(2):297-398. PubMed ID: 11652059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Surrogate gestator: a new and honorable profession. Ingram JD Marquette Law Rev; 1993; 76(4):675-99. PubMed ID: 11656585 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Response of Professor Field. Field MA Politics Life Sci; 1991 Feb; 9(2):262-8. PubMed ID: 11656634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. In defense of enforcement of the surrogate contract: a reply to Field. Hill JL Politics Life Sci; 1991 Feb; 9(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 11656633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. From the individual to the dividual: in the supermarket of "reproductive alternatives. Mies M Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(3):225-37. PubMed ID: 11650396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The case against enforcement of surrogacy contracts. Field MA Politics Life Sci; 1990 Feb; 8(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 11650311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A critique of pregnancy contracts: comments on articles by Hill, Merrick, Shevory, and Woliver. Okin SM Politics Life Sci; 1990 Feb; 8(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 11650312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Surrogate mothers grow in number despite questions. Lawson C N Y Times Web; 1986 Oct; ():C1, C18. PubMed ID: 11646530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Prohibiting payments to surrogate mothers: love's labor lost and the constitutional right to privacy. Bradley TS John Marshall Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):715-45. PubMed ID: 11650095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Seven-week trial touched many basic emotions. Hanley R N Y Times Web; 1987 Apr; ():B2. PubMed ID: 11646174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Alternative birth technologies: legal challenges. Capron AM Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):679-704. PubMed ID: 11659041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Dilemmas of the new birth technologies. Thom M Ms; 1988 May; 16(11):70-72, 74-76. PubMed ID: 11658995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The international traffic in women: women used in systems of surrogacy and reproduction. Raymond JG Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 11650411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered? Lieber KB Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]