These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646571)
21. All animals are equal, but some are better than others: patenting transgenic animals. Mark DA J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():245-68. PubMed ID: 11645691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Should animals be patented? Wallis C Time; 1987 May; 129(18):110. PubMed ID: 11645595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Draft report to annual and central conferences, Dec 1990: an invitation to explore a frontier. United Methodist Church. Genetic Science Task Force Engage Soc Action; 1991 Jan; 4(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 11659313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Vital essences and human wholeness: the social readings of biological information. Kevles DJ South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):255-78. PubMed ID: 11645834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Eight worries about patenting animals. Wachbroit R Rep Inst Philos Public Policy; 1988; 8(3):6-8. PubMed ID: 12083086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Of mice and machine: a paradigmatic challenge to interpretation of the patent statute. Chiapetta JR William Mitchell Law Rev; 1994; 20(1):155-90. PubMed ID: 11652852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Beyond Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Quigg: the controversy over transgenic animal patents continues. Hecht EJ Am Univ Law Rev; 1992; 41(3):1023-74. PubMed ID: 11652629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Intellectual property in higher life forms: the patent system and controversial technologies. Merges RP MD Law Rev; 1988; 47(4):1051-75. PubMed ID: 16514761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Patenting life. Kass LR Commentary; 1981 Dec; 72(6):45-57. PubMed ID: 11649383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Danes wary about engineered animals. Radin P New Sci; 1992 Oct; 135(1841):5. PubMed ID: 11656161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Questions raised over how U.S. backed genetically altered virus. Schneider K N Y Times Web; 1986 Apr; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Commodifying animals: ethical issues in genetic engineering of animals. Almond B Health Risk Soc; 2000 Mar; 2(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 15080125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Patenting life: biotechnology, intellectual property, and environmental ethics. Hettinger N Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev; 1995; 22(2):267-305. PubMed ID: 11656671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The prospect of private unauthorized eugenics and ten feet tall basketball players: a case of legislative oversight? Meredith RD J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1985; 1(1):155-72. PubMed ID: 11645591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The challenge of biotechnology. Gore A; Owens S Yale Law Policy Rev; 1985; 3(2):336-57. PubMed ID: 11652468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Meeting offers hope for fewer animal tests. Peterson I N Y Times Web; 1987 Apr; ():31. PubMed ID: 11647827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The rhetoric of scientific revolution. Nelkin D Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(4):38-9. PubMed ID: 11643017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Europe tries to untangle laws on patenting life. Dickson D Science; 1989 Feb; 243(4894):1002-3. PubMed ID: 11653832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Of mice and medicine: balancing scientific needs and animal welfare. Iglehart JK Washington Post; 1985 Sep; ():Health Su-15. PubMed ID: 11647799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Patent sought on making of part-human creatures: scientist seeks to touch off ethics debate. Weiss R Washington Post; 1998 Apr; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11647308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]