These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646596)
1. Guidelines issued on terminal care. Schmeck HM N Y Times Web; 1987 Sep; ():A23. PubMed ID: 11646596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Hastings Center guidelines on forgoing treatment. Mead AP Clin Ethics Rep; 1988; 2(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11651918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Tentative guidelines set for 'do-not-resuscitate' orders. Murray JP; Wood AP Ob Gyn News; 1982 Mar 1-14; 17(5):8. PubMed ID: 11654882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stopping treatment on grounds of futility: a role for institutional policy. Stell LK St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):481-97. PubMed ID: 11652704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. MDs, lawyers probe ethical, legal issues in ending treatment. Bolsen B Am Med News; 1984 Apr; 27(13):11-3. PubMed ID: 11653535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. "Euthanasia, Aiding Suicide and Cessation of Treatment": a critique. Williams JR Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1984 Nov; 17(7):589-91. PubMed ID: 11651758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician-assisted lethal injection vs. the plastic bag: will euthanasia legislation ever come? A comparison of standards in the Netherlands and the United States. Joas UA Temple Int Comp Law J; 1992; 6(2):365-401. PubMed ID: 11660113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Supportive care guidelines stir debate. Sandrick K Am Med News; 1984 May; 27(20):3, 11-13. PubMed ID: 11658530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Guidelines for nursing homes raise some questions. Bermel J Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Dec; 13(6):3. PubMed ID: 11644096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The tort liability of hospital ethics committees. Merritt AL South Calif Law Rev; 1987 Jul; 60(5):1239-97. PubMed ID: 11658947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts. Rhoden NK South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In the matter of Beverly Requena. Nimz M Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 11644091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The withdrawal of treatment: the costs and benefits of guidelines. Shannon TA Bioethics Dig; 1978 Apr; 3(4):1-6. PubMed ID: 11660917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Artificial nutrition and the terminally ill: how should Washington decide? Beatty JA Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):419-57. PubMed ID: 11652503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent, termination of medical treatment, and the Federal Tort Claims Act: a new proposal for the military health care system. Deardorff SE Mil Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 115():1-120. PubMed ID: 11658904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The 'mercy' killers. Ross V Macleans; 1983 Nov; 96(47):24-39. PubMed ID: 11658699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical ethics in life and death. Thompson R Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The recent amendments to the Texas Natural Death Act: implications for health care providers. Greenfield RE St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):1003-51. PubMed ID: 11652489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: implications for policy in 1985. Cassel CK Cardozo Law Rev; 1984; 6(2):287-302. PubMed ID: 11651801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill. Eisenberg KG Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]