These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646625)

  • 21. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
    Gilbert LJ
    J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Another right-to-die case poses new questions.
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11646799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Gray v. Romeo.
    Di Somma AV
    Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 11644379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cruzan v. Harmon and the dangerous claim that others can exercise an incapacitated patient's right to die.
    Ellman IM
    Jurimetrics; 1989; 29(4):389-401. PubMed ID: 11652559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In re Drabick.
    Di Somma AV
    Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11644377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A legal test of the right to die.
    Malcolm AH
    N Y Times Web; 1985 May; ():9. PubMed ID: 11646513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law.
    Bopp J; Avila D
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Constitutionalizing the "right to die".
    Mayo TW
    MD Law Rev; 1990; 49(1):103-55. PubMed ID: 11656023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Coming to terms with death: the Cruzan case.
    Martyn SR; Bourguignon HJ
    Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):817-58. PubMed ID: 11652588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In re Estate of Virginia T. Prange.
    Di Somma AV
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 11644470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital.
    Nimz MM
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov; 2(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 11644064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Delio v. Westchester County Medical Center.
    Kirkpatrick GA
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 11644323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rasmussen v. Fleming.
    Pollard CT
    Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(3):297-310. PubMed ID: 11644117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A line less reasonable: Cruzan and the looming debate over active euthanasia.
    Grant ER; Cleaver CA
    Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):99-256. PubMed ID: 11651215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. McConnell v. Beverly Enterprises.
    Di Somma AV
    Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):525-33. PubMed ID: 11644378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Cruzan decision -- a surgeon's perspective.
    McNoble DJ
    Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1990; 20(4):569-610. PubMed ID: 11652628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. USCC brief in Nancy Cruzan case: continued nutrition and hydration urged.
    United States Catholic Conference
    Origins; 1989 Oct; 19(21):345-51. PubMed ID: 11652554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty.
    Bopp J; Avila D
    Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In re Zahn.
    Kirkpatrick GA
    Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):485. PubMed ID: 11644072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In re Gardner.
    Thompson LC
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 11644474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.