165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646699)
21. The heart transplant dilemma.
Evans RW
Issues Sci Technol; 1986; 2(3):91-101. PubMed ID: 11658799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of new Medicare rules disputed.
Hochman A
Washington Post; 1985 Apr; ():B1, B5. PubMed ID: 11646425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Containing health care costs: ethical and legal implications of changes in the methods of paying physicians.
Capron AM; Brock DW; Cassell EJ
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1985-1986; 36(4):708-77. PubMed ID: 11650769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Fight over organs shifts to states from Washington.
Stolberg SG
N Y Times Web; 1999 Mar; ():A1, A26. PubMed ID: 11647629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The rights of patients in nursing homes: when is there state action?
Thomas BM
GMU Law Rev; 1982; 5(2):315-37. PubMed ID: 11658685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Six Texas hospitals refuse care to premature infants.
Busch L
Am Med News; 1984 Dec; 27(48):8. PubMed ID: 11653611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. New law may spur organ donations.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1987 Sep; ():1, 37. PubMed ID: 11647831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Improving access to organs.
N Y Times Web; 1999 Jul; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Federal panel urges U.S. organ network and transplant aid.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1986 Jul; ():A1, A11. PubMed ID: 11646525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. A new basis for allocating livers for transplant.
Veatch RM
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2000 Mar; 10(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 11658156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. U.S. issues limits on abortion aid by family clinics.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1987 Aug; ():1, 26. PubMed ID: 11647377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Public information.
Sprague CC; Pennington JC; Greenfield J
Transplant Proc; 1988 Feb; 20(1 Suppl. 1):1033-40. PubMed ID: 11652535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Disparate impact under Title VI: discrimination, by any other name, will still have the same impact.
Jurevic A
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1996; 15(2):237-65. PubMed ID: 11656871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Lawsuit seeks to bar U.S. from access to AIDS files.
Lewin T
N Y Times Web; 1996 Apr; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11647112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Hospitals refusing to admit poor.
Engel M
Washington Post; 1984 Oct; ():B1, B4. PubMed ID: 11647787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. New law protects rights of patients in nursing homes.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1988 Jan; ():1, 18. PubMed ID: 11647836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Private hospitals' dumping of patients.
Bernard BP
N Y Times Web; 1985 Oct; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Who should get liver transplants?: as demand far outpaces donors, federal officials may revamp rules.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1996 Dec; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 11648044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. "Just what the doctor ordered": Oregon's Medicaid rationing process and public participation in risk regulation.
Halligan CJ
Georgetown Law J; 1995 Sep; 83(7):2697-725. PubMed ID: 11660267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Making hard choices under the Medicare prospective payment system: one administrative model for allocating medical resources under a government health insurance program.
Kinney ED
Indiana Law Rev; 1986; 19(4):1151-97. PubMed ID: 11650765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
