BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646717)

  • 1. Protecting the baby: work in pregnancy poses legal frontier.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Aug; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal protection and freedom of contract.
    Paul EF
    Public Aff Q; 1992 Jul; 6(3):305-26. PubMed ID: 11652079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Women's job rights collide with fears of birth defects.
    Kilborn PT
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Sep; ():1, 28. PubMed ID: 11646784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. UAW v. Johnson Controls: gender discrimination in the fetotoxic workplace.
    Brown JW
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1992; 44(2):479-529. PubMed ID: 11651453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Getting beyond discrimination: a regulatory solution to the problem of fetal hazards in the workplace.
    Buss E
    Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):577-98. PubMed ID: 11658700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The toxic workplace: Title VII protection for the potentially pregnant person.
    Andrade VM
    Harv Womens Law J; 1981; 4(1):71-105. PubMed ID: 11649449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Firing the woman to protect the fetus: the reconciliation of fetal protection with employment opportunity goals under Title VII.
    Williams WW
    Georgetown Law J; 1981 Feb; 69(3):641-704. PubMed ID: 11649426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal exclusion policies and gendered constructions of suitable work.
    Draper E
    Soc Probl; 1993 Feb; 40(1):90-107. PubMed ID: 11652221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Court voids limits to women in jobs on basis of fetus.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A1, B12. PubMed ID: 11646829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal protection policies in the workplace: continuing controversy in light of Johnson Controls.
    Blank R
    Politics Life Sci; 1992 Aug; 11(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 11659520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal protection: law, ethics and corporate policy.
    Sprotzer I; Goldberg IV
    J Bus Ethics; 1992 Oct; 11(10):731-5. PubMed ID: 11652069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prenatal exposure to fetally toxic work environments: the dilemma of the 1978 Pregnancy Amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
    Furnish HA
    Iowa Law Rev; 1980 Oct; 66(1):63-129. PubMed ID: 11661992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A delicate condition.
    Andrews LB
    Stud Lawyer; 1985 May; 13(9):30-6. PubMed ID: 11649782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From the workplace to the delivery room: protecting the fetus in the post-Roe era.
    Maschke KJ
    Politics Life Sci; 1993 Feb; 12(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 11656400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1991 Mar; 111():1196-217. PubMed ID: 12041279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ousted woman wins a suit under toxic chemical law.
    N Y Times Web; 1984 Aug; ():42. PubMed ID: 11646440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When becoming pregnant is a crime.
    Paltrow LM
    Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 11650910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protecting workers from reproductive hazards.
    Levitsky M
    Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):488-97. PubMed ID: 11651101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal protection programs under Title VII--rebutting the procreation assumption.
    Blanco AC
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1985; 46(3):755-94. PubMed ID: 11649206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fathers and fetuses.
    Davis DL
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A27. PubMed ID: 11646240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.