444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646758)
1. Justices find a right to die, but the majority sees need for clear proof of intent.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A18, A19. PubMed ID: 11646758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The right to death.
Dworkin R
New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun; 110():2841-92. PubMed ID: 12041283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cruzan and the constitutional status of nontreatment decisions for incompetent patients.
Robertson JA
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1139-202. PubMed ID: 11652580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests.
Watson DE
Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Family matters: is big brother your next-of-kin?
Lomasky LE
Reason; 1990 Nov; 22(6):36-9. PubMed ID: 11652569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law.
Bopp J; Avila D
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Doing justice to life: for the Cruzans, pain; for principle, a triumph; How to put life in the right to die.
N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11646204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health: a clear and convincing call for comprehensive legislation to protect incompetent patients' rights.
Suhr JN
Am Univ Law Rev; 1991; 40(4):1477-519. PubMed ID: 11651350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
Gilbert LJ
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients.
Gottlich V
Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Introduction: the right to die after Cruzan.
Hoffmann DE
Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11651214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Specific intent, substituted judgment and best interests: a nationwide analysis of an individual's right to die.
Delaney JJ
Pace Law Rev; 1991; 11(3):565-641. PubMed ID: 11651454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Right-to-die case gets first hearing in Supreme Court.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Dec; ():A1, B26. PubMed ID: 11646739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Cruzan decision -- a surgeon's perspective.
McNoble DJ
Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1990; 20(4):569-610. PubMed ID: 11652628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Constituting family and death through the struggle with state power: Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
Ronzetti TA
Univ Miami Law Rev; 1991 Sep; 46(1):149-204. PubMed ID: 11652668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Another right-to-die case poses new questions.
N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11646799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
Johnson SH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. DeGrella v. Elston: Kentucky Supreme Court rules on an incompetent's right to die.
Mehrle JP
North KY Law Rev; 1994; 21(2):449-74. PubMed ID: 11653010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
